Comparison Study of Routing Protocol by Varying Mobility and Traffic (CBR, VBR and TCP) Using Random Walk & Random Way Point Models

Comparison Study of Routing Protocol by Varying Mobility and Traffic (CBR, VBR and TCP) Using Random Walk & Random Way Point Models

  ijett-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
  
© 2014 by IJETT Journal
Volume-7 Number-4                          
Year of Publication : 2014
Authors :  Ramanpreet Kaur ,Rakesh Kumari
  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V7P270

citation 

Ramanpreet Kaur ,Rakesh Kumar , Article : Comparison Study of Routing Protocol by Varying Mobility and Traffic (CBR, VBR and TCP) Using Random Walk & Random Way Point Models, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology(IJETT), 7(4),177-183, published by seventh sense research group

Abstract

Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are one of the fastest growing areas of research. They are an attractive technology for many applications, such as rescue and tactical operations, due to the flexibility provided by their dynamic infrastructure. In the current study we have compared the performance of three MANET protocols AODV as reactive, OLSR and TORA as proactive using random walk model and random way point models.These share some similar behavior, but the protocols internal mechanism leads to significant performance difference. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by varying network mobility and type of traffic (CBR, VBR and TCP). A detailed simulation has been carried out in OPNET. The metrics used for performance analysis are Throughput, Network load. Random Way Point mobility model for most of the MANET routing protocols give better performance than Random Walk Mobility Model.

References

[1] J Ying Ge,“Quality of Service Routing in Ad-Hoc Networks Using OLSR” Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03)0-7695-1874-5/03 $17.00 © 2002 IEEE.
[2] ] EM Royer, PM Melliar-Smith, and LE Moser. An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2001), vol. 3, pages 857–861, Helsinki, Finland, June 2001.
[3] Vishal Sharma, Harsukhpreet Singh “Performance evaluation of reactive routing protocol in MANET networks using GSM based voice traffic applications” Optik - Int. J. Light Electron Opt. Elsevier pp. 201-204 June 2012.
[4] Ashish Bagwari, Raman Jee, Pankaj Joshi, Sourabh Bisht, “Performance of AODV Routing Protocol with increasing the MANET Nodes and its effects on QoS of Mobile Ad hoc Networks” International Conference on Communication Systems and Network IEEE (2012).
[5] Liu Tie-yuan CHANG Liang?Gu Tian-long “Analyzing the Impact of Entity Mobility Models on the Performance of Routing Protocols in the MANET”. IEEE (2009).
[6] Manijeh Keshtgary and Vahide Babaiyan in “Performance Evaluation of Reactive, Proactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols in MANET” International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE) vol. 4, pp. 248-254 Feb 2012.
[7] Priti Garg, et. al. “Comparative Performance Analysis of Two Ad-hoc Routing Protocols”, International Conference on Network and Electronics Engineering IPCSIT vol.11, pp 99-104, 2011.
[8] A. Boukerche et.al. “Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: A survey “ELSEVIER /Computer Networks pp 3032-3080 Oct, 2011.
[9] Vasudha Arora et. al. “Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol for MANETs under different traffic conditions” IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology vol. 6, pp.79-84, 2010.
[10] N. Adam et. al “Effect of Node density on performances of three MANET Routing Protocols” International Conference on Electronics Devices, Systems and Applications ICEDSA, IEEE pp 321-325,2010.
[11] Pravin Ghosekar et. al “Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Imperative and Challenges” IJCA MANETs pp 153-158,2010.
[12] Md. Golam Kaosar a, Tarek R. Sheltami “Voice transmission over ad hoc network adapting optimum approaches to maximize the performance” Elsevier Computer Communications 32, pp 634–639, 2009.
[13] Abdellah Jamali el. at. “Comparative Analysis of Ad Hoc Networks Routing Protocols for Multimedia Streaming” International Journal of Advanced Computer Sciences and Applications, IEEE, pp.978-981 Mar 2009.
[14] Ravi Shankar Ramakrishnan & P. Vinod kumar, ”Performance Analysis of Different Codecs in VoIP Using SIP”, National Conference on Mobile and Pervasive Computing CoMPC-2008,pp 142-145.
[15] Zhan Huawai, Zhou Yun, “Comparison Analysis AODV and OLSR Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network” IEEE 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking transactions, pp 978-982, 2008.
[16] Phillippa Biggs “The Status of Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) WORLDWIDE” the strategy and policy unit International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Geneva from 15-16, pp.1-37 Jan 2007.
[17] Eric Thibodeau el at. “Investigating MANET Performance in a VOIP Context” IEEE CCECE/CCGEI, Ottawa, pp 920-923, May 2006.

Keywords:
MANET, AODV, OLSR, TORA, CBR, VBR, Random Walk Mobility Model, Random Way Point Mobility Model Performance Metrics.