Impact Test on Motor Cycle Helmet for Different Impact angles using FEA

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
  
© 2014 by IJETT Journal
Volume-12 Number-6
Year of Publication : 2014
Authors : S. Irfan Sadaq , Md. Abdul Raheem Junaidi , V. Suvarna Kumar , Joseph George. Konnully , Syed Sirajuddin Qadiri
  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V12P254

Citation 

S. Irfan Sadaq , Md. Abdul Raheem Junaidi , V. Suvarna Kumar , Joseph George. Konnully , Syed Sirajuddin Qadiri. "Impact Test on Motor Cycle Helmet for Different Impact angles using FEA", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V12(6),278-281 June 2014. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group

Abstract

A motorcycle helmet is the best protective head gear for the prevention of head injuries caused by different carnial impact. A finite element model based on realistic geometric features of a motorcycle helmet is established, and explicit finite element, COSMOS, is employed to simulate dynamic responses at different impact velocities. Peak acceleration and Head Injury Criterion values derived from the head form are used to assess the protective performance of the helmet. In this present work motor cycle helmet is designed and modelled in 3D modelling software Pro/Engineer. The impact analysis is performed on the helmet when colliding to a target at different speeds of 50 Km/hr, 60 Km/hr and 70 km/hr that faces the helmet on the front, right and back directions using COSMOS software. The materials used for the helmet is ABS and PVC.

References

[1] Aare, M.; Kleiven, S.: Evaluation of head response to ballistic helmet impacts, using FEM, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 34, 2007, 596–608.
[2] Barnes, F.: Skinner, Stan. ed. Cartridges of the World. 11th Edition. Cartridges of the World. GunDigest Books, 2006, p. 295, ISBN 978-0-89689-297-2.
[3] Baumgartner, D.; Willinger, R.: Finite element modeling of human head injuries caused by ballistic projectiles, Proc. RTO Specialist Meeting, the NATO, Koblenz, Germany, 2003.
[4] Carroll, A.; Soderstrom, C.: A new non-penetrating ballistic injury, Ann Surg., 188, 1978, 753–7. [5] Chang, F. K.; Chang, K. Y.: Post-Failure Analysis of Bolted Composite Joints in Tension or Shear-Out Mode Failure, J of composite material, 21, 1987, 809-833.
[6] Chang, F. K.; Chang, K. Y.: A Progressive Damage Model for Laminated Composites Containing Stress Concentrations, Journal of Composite Materials, 21, 1987, 834-55.
[7] Fox, D. M.: Energy Absorber for Vehicle Occupant Safety and Survivability. USA TACOM 6501 E 11Mile Road Warren, MI 48397-5000, 2006.
[8] N.J. Mills & A. Gilchrist, Finite element analysis of bicycle helmet oblique impacts, Int. J. Impact Engng.35, (2008) 1087-1101.
[9] COST 327: Motorcycle Safety Helmets (2001) Final report, Chapter 8. Directorate General for Energy and Transport, European Commission.
[10] MAGICS 12 software, Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium
[11] Holbourn AHS. Mechanics of head injury. Lancet 1943;2:438–41.
[12] Rhinoceros 3 software, Robert McNeel and associates, Seattle, USA.
[13] D. Hull, Introduction to composite materials, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1981.
[14] A. Gilchrist & N.J. Mills, Impact deformation of rigid polymeric foams: experiments and FEA modelling, Int. J. Impact Engng., 25 (2001) 767-786.
[15] A.F. Elragi at www.softoria.com/institute/geofoam
[16] D.H. Glaister & P. Mortimer, A test for the sliding resistance of protective helmets, RAF Institute of Aviation Medicine, Farnborough, Hants, Div. Record 28 (1982).

Keywords
Impact Analysis, Helmet, Impact angles, COSMOS, ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) and PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride).