Discussion of the New Models for Composite Reservoir Pressure Transient Analysis
Citation
Ashkan Jahanbani G., Tom A. Jelmert"Discussion of the New Models for Composite Reservoir Pressure Transient Analysis", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V38(4),214-217 August 2016. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group
Abstract
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects such
as steam injection into an oil reservoir are usually
analysed using composite reservoir models
consisting of two regions separated by a vertical
front. This simplification may lead to errors in the
estimates. To overcome this, analytical models have
been recently proposed taking into account some of
the effects such as gravity, heat loss and gradual
change of properties that are overlooked in the
conventional models. In this paper, description and
comparison of the recent models is given showing
the differences due to different ways of treating
gravity effect and variation of properties in the
intermediate region(s). For a better representation
of the composite reservoirs, it is suggested to apply
these new models with tilted fronts and smooth
change of the properties in type curve matching for
improved well test analysis. Multi-region multi-layer
composite model is an extension of the conventional
models that can be improved by adding more
intermediate regions and thin skin at the front
locations. This model can reasonably match the
recently developed models and should be used
instead of the simpler models in the case of
application of the conventional well test analysis.
References
[1] A. Satman, M. Eggenschwiler, R. W-K. Tang, and H. J.
Ramey Jr., “An Analytical Study of Transient Flow in
Systems with Radial Discontinuities,” in the 55th Annual
Meeting of SPE of AIME, Dallas, Texas, 1980, paper SPE
9399.
[2] A. K. Ambastha and H. J. Ramey Jr., “Pressure Transient
Analysis for a Three- Region Composite Reservoir,” in the
Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting of SPE of AIME,
Casper, Wyoming, 1992, paper SPE 24378.
[3] R. B. Bratvold and R. N. Horne, “Analysis of Pressure
Falloff Tests following Cold Water Injection,” SPE
Formation Evaluation Journal, vol. 5 (3), pp. 293-302,
1990.
[4] L. G. Acosta and A. K. Ambastha, “Thermal Well Test
Analysis Using an Analytical Multi-Region Composite
Reservoir Model,” in the Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition of SPE of AIME, New Orleans, Louisiana,
September 25-28, 1994, paper SPE 28422.
[5] C. Chakrabarty, “Pressure Transient Analysis of Non-
Newtonian Power Law Fluid Flow in Fractal Reservoirs,”
PhD Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
April 1993.
[6] M. B. Issaka and A. K. Ambastha, “An Improved Threeregion
Composite Reservoir Model for Thermal Recovery
Well Test Analysis,” in the Annual Meeting of CIM,
Calgary, Alberta, June 8-11, 1997, paper CIM 97-55.
[7] E. Gomes and A. K. Ambastha, “An Analytical Pressure-
Transient Model for Multilayered, Composite Reservoirs
with Pseudo-steady-State Formation Crossflow,” in SPE
Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska, 26-28 May,
1993, paper SPE 26049.
[8] A. Jahanbani G., and T. A. Jelmert, “A Multi-Layer
Commingled Composite Reservoir Model for Thermal
Well Test Analysis,” International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 18 (6), pp. 283-292,
2014.
[9] A. Jahanbani G., and T. A. Jelmert, “A New Composite
Reservoir Model for Thermal Well Test Analysis,”
International Journal of Engineering Trends and
Technology (IJETT), vol. 18 (8), pp. 357-366, 2014.
[10] A. Jahanbani G., and T. A. Jelmert, “A Multi-Layer Multi-
Region Well Test Model,” International Journal of
Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 19 (3),
pp. 154-158, 2015.
[11] A. Jahanbani G. and J. Kleppe, “Analysis of Heat Loss
Effects on Thermal Pressure Falloff Tests,” in the 14th
European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery,
Catania, Sicily, Italy, 8-11 September, 2014, paper EAGEMo
P23.
Keywords
well test analysis, composite reservoir,
gravity override, heat loss, tilted front.