Scalable and Distributed Mobile Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks for Oceanographic Applications

  ijett-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
© 2012 by IJETT Journal
Volume-3 Issue-2                          
Year of Publication : 2012
Authors :  Devee Prasan.U, Dr. Murugappan. S


Devee Prasan.U, Dr. Murugappan. S. "Scalable and Distributed Mobile Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks for Oceanographic Applications". International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT). V3(2):138-143 Mar-Apr 2012. ISSN:2231-5381. published by seventh sense research group


Large - scale mobile Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN) is a novel networking paradigm to explore aqueous environments. However, the characteristics of mobile UWSNs, such as low communication bandwidth, large propagation delay, floating node mobility, and high error probability, are signif icantly different from ground - based wireless sensor networks. The novel networking paradigm poses inter - disciplinary challenges that will require new technological solutions. In particular, in this article we adopt a top - down approach to explore the resear ch challenges in mobile UWSN design. Along the layered protocol stack, we roughly go down from the top application layer to the bottom physical layer. At each layer, a set of new design intricacies are studied. The conclusion is that building scalable mobi le UWSNs is a challenge that must be answered by inter - disciplinary efforts of acoustic communications, signal processing and mobile acoustic network protocol design.


[1] I. F. Akyil diz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia. Challenges for Efficient Communication in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. ACM SIGBED Review, Vol. 1(1), July 2004.
[2] W. Broecker and T. - H. Peng. Tracers in the sea. Eldigio Press, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, page 689, 1982.
[3] K. Fall. A Delay Tolerant Networking Architecture for Challenged Internets. In ACM SIGCOMM 2003, August 2003.
[4] J. Heidemann, Y. Li, A. Syed, J. Wills, and W. Ye. Underwater sensor networking: Resea rch challenges and potential applications. USC/ISI Technical Report ISI - TR - 2005 - 603, 2005.
[5] D. A. Jay, W. R. Geyer, R. J. Uncles, J. Vallino, J. Largier, and W. R. Boynton. A review of recent developments in estuarine scalar flux estimation. Estuaries, 20(2):262 – 280, 1997.
[6] D. B. Kilfoyle and A. B. Baggeroer. The State of the Art in Underwater Acoustic Telemetry. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, OE - 25(5):4 – 27, January 2000.
[7] J. Kong, Z. Ji, W. Wang, M. Gerla, R. Bagrodia, and B. Bhargava. Low - c ost Attacks against Packet Delivery, Localization and Synchronization Services in Under - Water Sensor Networks. In Fourth ACM Workshop on Wireless Security (WiSe), 2005.
[8] J. G. Proakis, E. M. Sozer, J. A. Rice, and M. Stojanovic. ShallowWater Acoustic Ne tworks. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 114 – 119, November 2001.
[9] E. M. Sozer, M. Stojanovic, and J. G. Proakis. Undersea Acoustic Networks. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, OE - 25(1):72 – 83, January 2000.
[10] C. - Y. Wan, A. T. Campbell, and L. Kr ishnamurthy. PSFQ: A Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In WSNA’02, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 2002.
[11] C. - Y. Wan, S. B. Eisenman, and A. T. Campbell. CODA: Congestion Detection and Avoidance in Sensor Networks. In ACM SenSys ’03, Los Angeles, California, USA, November 2003

propagation delay, wireless sensor networks, acoustic communications , signal p rocessing, network protocol