A Systematic Review of Trends and Methods for Chikungunya Detection from 2002 to 2023
A Systematic Review of Trends and Methods for Chikungunya Detection from 2002 to 2023 |
||
|
||
© 2024 by IJETT Journal | ||
Volume-72 Issue-8 |
||
Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
Author : Sebastián Ramos-Cosi, Estefani Miñope-Anchaya, Meyluz Paico-Campos, Ana Huamani Huaracca, Michael Cieza-Terrones, Alicia Alva-Mantari |
||
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I8P127 |
How to Cite?
Sebastián Ramos-Cosi, Estefani Miñope-Anchaya, Meyluz Paico-Campos, Ana Huamani Huaracca, Michael Cieza-Terrones, Alicia Alva-Mantari, "A Systematic Review of Trends and Methods for Chikungunya Detection from 2002 to 2023," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 279-291, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I8P127
Abstract
The mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus represents a global challenge due to ineffective preventive measures and unhealthy behaviors. This study underscores the urgency of effectively addressing this disease and developing robust prevention and control strategies at the global level. Its spread has increased markedly in recent decades, especially in the Americas and Peru. This study was based on a comprehensive review of the literature related to diagnostic methods and electronic devices for the detection of the Chikungunya virus. We use the Scopus platform and apply filters to identify relevant articles and papers. The results indicate steady growth in research on the diagnosis of the virus, with a peak of 156 publications in 2021. The United States and India led research into Chikungunya detection methods. In addition, international collaborations and a diversity of document types were identified, highlighting the breadth of approaches in this area. Funding for the research came from national and international institutions, highlighting the importance of developing effective detection methods, including biosensors and electrochemical techniques. It is concluded that it is essential to continue with an exhaustive review of articles in other databases, such as Web of Science, and to explore more effective detection methods in order to improve the detection and control capacity of the disease..
Keywords
Chikungunya, Diagnosis, Detection methods, Review, Electronic devices.
References
[1] G.W. Parker, “Best Practices for After-Action Review: Turning Lessons Observed into Lessons Learned for Preparedness Policy," Scientific and Technical Review, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 579-590, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] María Fernanda Ávila Mejía, Pei-Yun Shu, and Dar-Der Ji, “Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika Diagnoses by Primary Healthcare Physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Geographic Expansion of Dengue and Chikungunya Cases Beyond Historical Areas of Transmission in the Region of the Americas, WHO, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/es/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2023-DON448
[4] G. Rezza et al., “Infection with Chikungunya Virus in Italy: An Outbreak in a Temperate Region,” Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9602, pp. 1840-1846, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Pasathorn Yodtaweepornanan, Wanjak Pongsittisak, and Panchalee Satpanich, “Incidence and Factors Associated with Chronic Chikungunya Arthritis Following Chikungunya Virus Infection,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 653-659, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Fredy Brice Nemg Simo, Felicity Jane Burt, and Nigel Aminake Makoah, “Chikungunya Virus Diagnosis: A Review of Current Antigen Detection Methods,” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Paula Maria Pereira de Almeida et al., “Spatio-Temporal Cluster Detection of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika Viruses' Infection in Rio de Janeiro State from 2010 to 2019,” Viruses, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1-14, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Raquel L. Souza et al., “Density of Aedes Aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Low-Income Brazilian Urban Community Where Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya Viruses Co-Circulate,” Parasit Vectors, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Lacita Menezes Skalinski et al., “Chikungunya Seroprevalence in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Archives of Public Health, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Koen Bartholomeeusen et al., “Chikungunya Fever,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Peter Asaga Mac et al., “Antibody Seropositivity and Endemicity of Chikungunya and Zika Viruses in Nigeria,” Animal Diseases, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Weslley Barbosa Sales et al., “Contributions of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation in Patients after Chikungunya Fever: A Systematic Review,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Pablo Cantalice Santos Farias et al., “Epidemiological Profile of Arboviruses in Two Different Scenarios: Dengue Circulation vs. Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika Co-Circulation,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Juan C. Rueda et al., “Clinical Diagnosis of Chikungunya Infection: An Essential Aid in a Primary Care Setting Where Serological Confirmation is Not Available,” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-16, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Peiqi Yin et al., “Chikungunya Virus Cell-to-Cell Transmission is Mediated by Intercellular Extensions in Vitro and in Vivo,” Nature Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1653-1667, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Yukari C. Manabe et al., “Clinical Evaluation of the Biofire Global Fever Panel for the Identification of Malaria, Leptospirosis, Chikungunya, and Dengue From Whole Blood: A Prospective, Multicentre, Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy Study,” Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1356-1364, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Malek G. Daher et al., “Modeling of a Novel Chikungunya Virus Detector Based on Silicon and Titanium Nitride Multilayer Thin Films,” Optik, vol. 287, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Meijun Guo et al., “Development and Evaluation of Recombinant E2 Protein Based IgM Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Double Antigen Sandwich ELISA for Detection of Antibodies to Chikungunya Virus,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1-13, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Pradakshina Sharma et al., “PBIS-Based System Integrated with Zinc–Silver Nanocomposite for the Detection of Chikungunya Virus,” Biosens Bioelectron X, vol. 13, pp. 1-8, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] M.M. Parida et al., “Rapid and Real-Time Detection of Chikungunya Virus by Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 351-357, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Denise Maria do Nascimento Costa et al., “The Relationship between Chikungunya Virus and the Kidneys: A Scoping Review,” Reviews of Medical Virology, vol. 33, no. 1, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] José Moreira et al., “Mapping the Global Landscape of Chikungunya Rapid Diagnostic Tests: A Scoping Review,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1-17, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb et al., “Early Warning Systems (EWSs) for Chikungunya, Dengue, Malaria, Yellow Fever, and Zika Outbreaks: What is the Evidence? A Scoping Review,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1-25, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Philippe Berthiaume, Jean-Charles Côté, and Mariola Mascarenhas, “A Scoping Review of Published Literature on Mathematical Modelling for Chikungunya,” CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, vol. 14, no. 59, pp. 1-17, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Mariola Mascarenhas et al., “A Scoping Review of Published Literature on Chikungunya Virus,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1-40, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Camille Fritzell et al., “Current Challenges and Implications for Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika Seroprevalence Studies Worldwide: A Scoping Review,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1-29, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Jhoana P Romero-Leiton et al., “Modelling the Transmission of Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya: A Scoping Review Protocol,” BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1-6, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Favour D. Agbajor, and Modupe Cecilia Mewomo, “Green Building Research in South Africa: A Scoping Review and Future Roadmaps,” Energy and Built Environment, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 316-335, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Ratanamala S. Darole et al., “Synthesis of Novel Rhodamine-Type Antronaspirolactam (ASL) Analogues and Evaluation of Antiviral Activity against Dengue and Chikungunya Viruses,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 261, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Gustavo Alves Miguel, Gabriel Gerber Hornink, and Paulo Alexandre Bressan, “Mobile Devices to Obtain Georeferenced Data from Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya | AedesMap: A Mobile Alternative for Obtaining Georeferenced Dengue, Zika E Chikungunya Data,” InfoDesign - Brazilian Journal of Information Design, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 96-115, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] L. Codina, C. Lopezosa, and P. Freixa Font, “Scoping Reviews in Academic Works in Communication: Frameworks and Sources,” Information and Big Data in the Hybrid Media System, pp. 67-85, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Janus Christian Jakobsen et al., “When and How Should Multiple Imputation be Used for Handling Missing Data in Randomised Clinical Trials - A Practical Guide With Flowcharts,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Christian R Mejia et al., “Use of Information Sources in Newly Graduated Physicians in Lima,” Peruvian Journal of Experimental Medicine and Public Health, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 716-720, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Matthew E. Falagas et al., “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 338-342, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Philippe Mongeon, and Adèle Paul-Hus, “The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 213-228, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Bo-Christer Björk, and David Solomon, “Open Access versus Subscription Journals: A Comparison of Scientific Impact,” BMC Medicine, vol. 10, pp. 1-10, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Iain D. Craig et al., “Do Open Access Articles Have Greater Citation Impact?. A Critical Review of the Literature,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 239-248, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Mikael Laakso, “Green Open Access Policies of Scholarly Journal Publishers: A Study of What, When, and Where Self-Archiving is Allowed,” Scientometrics, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 475-494, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Carmen Rodríguez Otero, Uxía Gutiérrez Couto, and Ana Calvo Ferrer, “Open Access Availability of the Scientific Production of the Galician Health Service (Sergas) from 2014 to 2019,” Galicia Clínica, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 12-17, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Darwin Cruz García, and Diana Carolina Tibaná Ríos, “Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Production of Digital Social Work with Scopus and Bibliometrix,” Educational Synergies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 82-102, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Ruben Cañedo Andalia et al., “Scopus: The Largest Database of Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature Available to Underdeveloped Countries,” ACIMED, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 270-282, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] María Natalia Campos Soto, Magdalena Ramos Navas-Parejo, and Antonio José Moreno Guerrero, “Virtual Reality and Motivation in the Educational Context: A Bibliometric Study of the Last Twenty Years of Scopus,” Alteridad, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 44-56, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Rocío Martín García, Noelia Muñoz Delgado, and Carmen Martín Salinas, “Nursing Interventions Aimed at Preventing Frailty in the Elderly,” Clinical Nutrition and Hospital Dietetics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 162-170, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Juan S. González-Sanabria et al., “Indexing and Abstract Services, an Undervalued Opportunity for Improving the Visibility and Dissemination of Articles Published in Latin American Scientific Journals: DOAJ Case,” Technological Information, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 223-234, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Javier Sanz-Valero et al., “Methodological Filters: Application to Bibliographic Search in Spanish Occupational Medicine,” Medicine and Occupational Safety, vol. 54, no. 211, pp. 75-83, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Ángel Rodríguez Laso et al., “Analysis of Selection Bias in the Pilot of a Longitudinal Study on Aging in Spain,” Gaceta Sanitaria, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 425-432, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] George Drosatos, and Eleni Kaldoudi, “Blockchain Applications in the Biomedical Domain: A Scoping Review,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 17, pp. 229-240, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Gonzalo Luján Villarreal et al., “Journal Integration from Institutional Repositories to Open Journal Systems,” IX International Conference on Libraries and Digital Repositories in Latin America, São Paulo, Brasil, pp. 1-14, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Dung Thai et al., “Using BibTeX to Automatically Generate Labeled Data for Citation Field Extraction,” arXiv, pp. 1-12, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Nees Van Eck, and Ludo Waltman, “Survey Software: VOS Viewer, A Bibliometric Mapping Computer Program,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523-538, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Cristina Jiménez Noblejas, and Antonio Perianes Rodríguez, “Information Retrieval and Visualization in Web of Science and Scopus: A Practical Approach,” Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información, vol. 28, no. 64, pp. 15-31, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Francisco Ganga Contreras, Lorena Paredes Buzeta, and Liliana Pedraja-Rejas, “Importance of Scholarly Publications: Some Problems and Recommendations to Consider,” Ideas (Arica), vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 111-119, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Elcido Padilla, and Eduardo Redondo, “Sponsorship Marketing - Sponsoring (Communication through Sponsorship),” Simon Bolivar University Editions, Faculty of Administration and Business, 2000.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] Pablo E. Vera Villarroel et al., “Scientific Production in Latin American Psychology: An Analysis of Research by Country,” Latin American Journal of Psychology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 95-104, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[55] Carmen Gálvez, “Visualization of the Main Lines of Research in Public Health: An Analysis Based on Bibliometric Maps Applied to the Spanish Journal of Public Health (2006-2015),” Spanish Journal of Public Health, vol. 90, pp. 1-10, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[56] Fernan Cosme Chaname Zapata et al., “Knowledge and Prevention Measures Against Sexually Transmitted Infections in Peruvians andean Adolescents,” Public Health Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]