Control Actions Measurement to Propagation of Cascading Outages in the Power System

Control Actions Measurement to Propagation of Cascading Outages in the Power System

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
  
© 2017 by IJETT Journal
Volume-53 Number-1
Year of Publication : 2017
Authors : Ajay Kumar Lal

Citation 

Ajay Kumar Lal "Control Actions Measurement to Propagation of Cascading Outages in the Power System", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V53(1),1-6 November 2017. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group

Abstract
Cascaded events can damage to equipment of power plants, interruption of production cycles, and great economic losses. To locate the fault a positive sequence voltage and current phasors at both ends of a transmission line can be used to determine the faulted area. This includes identifying whether the action of protective relays are related to fault conditions or overloads. Meanwhile, the flow transfers and “Discriminating” factors the sensitivity based power flow analysis is adopted. To calculate the overloads occurring due to the outages and measure propagation of cascading failures across a transmission network a sensitivity factors based generation shift factors (GSF) and line outage distribution factors (LODF) can be used. It is proposes a new methodology CAMA to measure the necessary control action and combination of local and wide area information that is time synchronized provides the ability to stabilize electric power system in ways that minimize necessary control actions. The main purpose of this technique is to improve disturbance monitoring and system event analysis. The efficacy of this control actions can be measured in a sample IEEE-6 bus power system interconnected network and work has been carried out in MATLABenvironment.

Reference
[1] Wood A.J and Wollenberg B.F., “Power generation, operation and control”, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1996.
[2] S. Pahwa1, A. Hodges1, C. Scoglio1, S. Wood2 “ Topological Analysis of the Power Grid and Mitigation Strategies Against Cascading Failures”; 978-1-4244-5883-7/10 -2010 IEEE.
[3] S. Lim, C. Liu, S. Lee, M. Choi, and S. Rim, “Blocking of Zone 3 Relays to Prevent Cascaded Events,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 23, Issue 2, May 2008, pp. 747–754.
[4] Junjian Qi, Member, IEEE, Kai Sun, Senior Member, IEEE, and Shengwei Mei, Senior Member, IEEE, “An Interaction Model for Simulation and Mitigation of Cascading Failures” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 30, NO. 2, MARCH 2015.
[5] J.S. Thorp, A.G. Phadke, S.H. Horowitz, M.M Begovic, “Some Applications of Phasor Measurements to Adaptive Protection,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 791-798, May 1998.
[6] S. El Safty** M. M. Abo El Nasr * S. F. Mekhemer* M.M. Mansour*; New Technique for Fault location in Interconnected Networks using Phasor Measurement Unit:978-1-4244-1933-3/08/$25.00 ©2008 IEEE.
[7] Marek Zima, StzrdentMeniber. IEEE and Goran Andersson, Fellow. IEEE; Wide Area Monitoring and Control as a Tool for Mitigation of Cascading Failures.
[8] Ibrahem Totonchi, Hussain Al Akash, Abdelhadi Al Akash and Ayman Faza, “Sensitivity Analysis for the IEEE 30 Bus System using Load-Flow Studies”, 978-1-4799-0688- 8/13/$31.00 ©2013 IEEE.
[9] Slimane Souag, Farid Benhamida*(1), Yacine Salhi, Abdelber Bendaoud(2), Fatima Zohra Gherbi (3) “Sensitivity Factor for Power System Security Analysis Using LabVIEW”, 978-1-4673-6374-7/13/$31.00 ©2013 IEEE.
[10] M. J. Damborg, M. Kim, J. Huang, S. S. Venkata, and A. G. Phadke, “Adaptive protection as preventive and emergency control,” in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Summer Meeting, Jul. 2000, vol. 2.
[11] Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada, U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force, 2004.
[12] Final Report of the Maintaining Reliability in a Competitive U.S. Electricity Industry, North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) Task Force on Electric System Reliability, 1998.
[13] T. Nye, C. C. Liu, and M. Hofmann, “Adaptation of relay operations in real time,” in Proc. 15th PSCC, Session1, Paper 6, Liege, Belgium, Aug. 2005.
[14] H. You, V. Vittal, and Z. Yang, “Self-healing in power systems: An approach using islanding and rate of frequency decline-based load shedding,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 174–181, Feb. 2003.
[15] P. Crucitti, V. Latora, and M. Marchiori, “A topological analysis of the italian electric power grid,” Physica A : Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol.338, no.1-2, pp.92-97, July 2004.
[16] I. Dobson J. Chen, J.S Thorp, “Cascading dynamics and mitigation assessment in power system disturbances via a hidden failure model,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol.27, no.4, pp.318-326, May 2005.
[17] G. Andersson, P. Donalek, R. Farmer, N. Hatziargyriou, I. Kamwa, P. Kundur, N. Martins, J. Paserba, P. Pourbeik, J. Sanchez-Gasca, R. Schulz, A. Stankovic, C. Taylor, and V. Vittal, “Causes of the 2003Major Grid Blackouts in North America and Europe, and Recommended Means to Improve System Dynamic Performance,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 20, Issue 4, November 2005, pp. 1922– 1928.

Keywords
Control Action Measurement Algorithm (CAMA), Cascaded Events Discriminating Algorithm (CEDA), cascading events, wide-area control, protective relay, phasor measurement unit (PMU), zone 3 distance relay.