Prioritization of the Industrial Maintenance Activities According its Ergonomics Risks using Multicriteria Analysis AHP

Prioritization of the Industrial Maintenance Activities According its Ergonomics Risks using Multi-criteria Analysis AHP

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
  
© 2018 by IJETT Journal
Volume-59 Number-5
Year of Publication : 2018
Authors : Marjorie Belinelli, Izabel C. Zattar, Marcel Matsuzaki da Silva, Robson Seleme, Gilberto F.M. de Souza, Marcelo Rodrigues,Claudilaine Caldas de Oliveira, Apledinei Savoldi
DOI :  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V59P241

Citation 

Marjorie Belinelli, Izabel C. Zattar, Marcel Matsuzaki da Silva, Robson Seleme, Gilberto F.M. de Souza, Marcelo Rodrigues,Claudilaine Caldas de Oliveira, Apledinei Savoldi"Prioritization of the Industrial Maintenance Activities According its Ergonomics Risks using Multi-criteria Analysis AHP", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V59(5),214-222 May 2018. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group

Abstract
The activities of industrial maintenance, which provide operational availability and reliability to the industrial production system, have at their core occupational risks to workers, particularly of ergonomic that influence the physical and organizational working conditions. The ergonomic factors related to industrial maintenance activities are poorly studied. Therefore, there is a need to identify the risks of ergonomic intrinsic to industrial maintenance activities and thus classify them regarding: the degree of treatment priority, their dangerousness concerning the physical conditions of the maintenance technician and their influence on the quality of maintenance services. This article demonstrates the identification of ergonomics risks presents during the performance of industrial maintenance activities, with the application of the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) multi criteria analysis. This risk analysis directs to the criticality level determination, and to the impact that these risks may result regarding the quality of the industrial maintenance service provided.

Reference
[1] S.Lind, S.Nenonen and J.K.Rahnasto, 2008. “Safety risk assessment in industrial maintenance”,Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol.14 (2), pp. 205-217, (2008).
[2] A. Sharma, G.S. Yadava and S.G. Deshmukh, S.G., “A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization”,Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 17(1), pp. 5-25, (2011).
[3] S.G. Katkamwar , S.K. Wadatkarand R.Paropate, “Study of Total Productive Maintenance & Its Implementing Approach in Spinning Industries”,International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol.4, pp. 1750-1754, (2013).
[4] S.H Ding, S. Kamaruddin andI.A.Azid, “Maintenance policy selection model: a case study in the palm oil industry”,Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 25 (3), pp. 415 – 435, (2014).
[5] M. Faccio, A. Persona, F. Sgarbossa and G.Zanin, “Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework”,International Journal Production Economics, vol. 147 (1), pp. 85-93, (2014).
[6] A. Muller, M.CSuhner andBIung, “Maintenance alternative integration to prognosis process engineering”,Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 13 (2), pp. 198-211, (2007).
[7] W. Kim, J. Yang andS.Ahn, “Determining the Periodic Maintenance Interval for Guaranteeing the Availability of a System with a Linearly Increasing Hazard Rate”,International Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 2 (15), pp. 126-134, (2009).
[8] C. Grusenmeyer, “Maintenance: organizational modes, activities and health and safety: Use of a French national survey and in-situ analyses”,Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 73, pp. 187–199, (2014).
[9] I. Iida, Ergonomia: Projeto e Produção. 1ª. ed. São Paulo, Brasil: Edgard Blücher, 2005. (in Portuguese)
[10] K.O. Roper andD.C. Yeh, “Ergonomic solutions for an aging workforce”,Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 5, pp. 172-178,(2007).
[11] M. McCallig, G.Paddan, E.V. Lente, K. Moore and M. Coggins, “ Evaluating worker vibration exposures using self-reported and direct observation estimates of exposure duration”, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 42, pp. 37-45,(2010).
[12] E. Johanning,“Vibration and shock exposure of maintenance-of-way vehicles in the railroad industry”,Applied Ergonomics, vol. 42(4), pp. 555-562,(2011).
[13] J. Duland B. Weerdmeester, Ergonomia Prática, 1ª. ed., São Paulo, Brasil: Edgard Blücher,2012.(in Portuguese)
[14] I. Dianat, M.Kord, P. Yahyazade, M.A. Karimi andA.W.Stedmon, “Association of individual and work-related risk factors with musculoskeletal symptoms among Iranian sewing machine operators”,Applied Ergonomics, vol. 51, pp. 180 – 188,(2015).
[15] T. Reiman, “Understanding maintenance work in safety-critical organisations – managing the performance variability”,Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,vol.12, pp.339-366,(2011).
[16] J.O. Akinyoola, O.L.Rominiyi , S.O. Afolabi, B.A.Adaramola and O.M. Ikumapayi, “Ergonomics Aspect of Occupational Hazard in the Data Processing in a Typical University Medical Centre”, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 48 (8), pp.440-445,(2017).
[17] S. Gowda, V. Kulkarni andC.Kapali, “Ergonomics Study for Injection Moulding Section using RULA and REBA Techniques”, International. Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT),vol. 36 (6),pp.294-301,(2016)
[18] A. Otto andA. Scholl, “Incorporating ergonomic risks into assembly line balancing”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 212, pp. 277– 286,(2011).
[19] E. Tompa, R. Dolinschi and J. Natale, “Economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics intervention in a textile plant”, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 44(3), pp. 480-487,(2013)
[20] N.S. Arunraj andJ. Maiti, “Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming”. Safety Science, vol.48,238-247, (2010).
[21] S. Zaim, A.Turky?lmaz, M.F. Acar, U.Al?Turki andO.F.Demirel, “Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study”,Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 18, 16 – 29, (2012).
[22] M. Bertolini andM. Bevilacqua, “A Combined Goal Programming –AHP Approach to Maintenance Selection Problem”,Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 70, pp. 71 – 73,(2006).
[23] K. Shyjith, S.Ilangkumaran and M.Kumanan, Multi?criteria decision?making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry”,Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 16 – 29,(2008).
[24] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1st ed., New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[25] E. Forman andK. Peniwati, “Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process”,European Journal of Operation Research, vol. 108, pp. 165-169, (1998).
[26] T.C. CostaandM.C.Belderrain, “Decisão em grupo em métodos multicritério de apoio à decisão” em Anais do 15º Encontro de Iniciação Científica e Pós-Graduação do ITA, 2009. (in Portuguese)
[27] T.L. Saaty andL.G Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Series in Operations Research &Management Science (Book 175). New York, USA: Springer, 2012.

Keywords
Industrial Maintenance,Multicriteria Analysis,Risk Analysis,Ergonomics,Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).