Optimization of Hydrogen Production Through Methane Steam Reforming in a Membrane Reactor
 |
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) |  |
| © 2018 by IJETT Journal | ||
| Volume-64 Number-2 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2018 | ||
| Authors : Mellyssa S. de Souza, Otávio F. Ivo, Argimiro R. Secchi |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V64P214 |
Citation
MLA Style: Mellyssa S. de Souza, Otávio F. Ivo, Argimiro R. Secchi "Optimization of Hydrogen Production Through Methane Steam Reforming in a Membrane Reactor" International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 64.2 (2018): 75-80.
APA Style:Mellyssa S. de Souza, Otávio F. Ivo, Argimiro R. Secchi (2018). Optimization of Hydrogen Production Through Methane Steam Reforming in a Membrane Reactor. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 64(2), 75-80.
Abstract
Hydrogen is used as fuel and as raw material in important processes. Steam methane reforming is the main route for hydrogen production with the process being globally endothermic and reversible, which requires operating at high temperatures to achieve satisfactory conversions. Membrane reactors are an interesting alternative since it leads to higher conversions at lower temperatures. In order to consolidate this technology, it is necessary to find the optimal operational conditions. Temperature (T), reaction pressure (P), permeate pressure (PP), steam to methane molar ratio in the feedstock (m) and methane feed flow rate (FCH40) were chosen as decision variables. The objective function was defined as the sum of methane conversion and hydrogen recovery. The Flexible Polyhedra method was used as optimization algorithm. Considering the determined optimal conditions, a methane conversion of 99.94% and a recovery of hydrogen of 98.87% were achieved.
Reference
[1] SPEIGHT, J. G, Chemical and process design handbook. 1 ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2002.
[2] KUMAR, A.; BALDEA, M.; EDGAR, T. M., “Real-time optimization of an industrial steam-methane reformer under distributed sensing”, Control Engineering Practice, v. 54, pp. 140-153, sep. 2016.
[3] NOBANDEGANI, M. S.; BIRJANDI, M. R. S.; DARBANDI T., et al., “An industrial Steam Methane Reformer optimization using response surface methodology”, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, v. 36, pp. 540-549, 2016.
[4] PENG, D., “Analysis of the Thermal Efficiency Limit of the Steam Methane Reforming”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., v. 51, pp. 16385?16392, 2012.
[5] SILVA, L.C., MURATA, V.V., HORI, C.E. et al., "Hydrogen production from methane steam reforming: parametric and gradient based optimization of a Pd-based membrane reactor", Optimization and Engineering, v. 11, pp. 441–458, sep. 2010.
[6] SJARDIN, M.; DAMEN, K. J.; FAAIJ, A. P. C., "Techno-economic prospects of small-scale membrane reactors in a future hydrogen-fuelled transportation sector", Energy, v. 31, pp. 2523–2555, 2006.
[7] LIN, Y.; LIU, S.; CHUANG, C.; CHU, Y., "Effect of incipient removal of hydrogen through palladium membrane on the conversion of methane steam reforming: Experimental and modeling", Catalysis Today, v. 82, pp. 127–139, 2003.
[8] SHU, J.; BERNARD, P. A. G.; KALIAGUINE, S., "Methane steam reforming in asymmetric Pd- and Pd-Ag/porous SS membrane reactors", Applied Catalysis A: General, v. 119, pp. 305-325, 1994.
[9] ROUX, J. F., Membrane Reactor Modeling for Hydrogen Production through Methane Steam Reforming. Dissertation (Master of Science In Chemical Engineering) - Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, 2011.
[10] NELDER, J. A., MEAD, R. “A Simplex Method for Function Minimization”, The Computer Journal, v. 7, n. 4, pp. 308–313, 1965.
[11] XU J., FROMENT G. F., “Methane Steam Reforming, Methanation and Water-Gas Shift: I. Intrinsic Kinetics”, AIChE Journal, v. 35, n. 1, pp. 88-96, jan. 1989
Keywords
methane steam reforming, membrane reactor, optimization, hydrogen production, Nelder-Mead algorithm.