IJBTT

Analysis of Various Enablers of Sustainable Supply Chain using MICMAC Analysis

	International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)
	© 2019 by IJETT Journal
	Volume-67 Issue-5
	Year of Publication : 2019
	Authors : Sheikh Asim, Payal Bhargava
	DOI :  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V67I5P203

Citation 

MLA Style: Sheikh Asim, Payal Bhargava "Analysis of Various Enablers of Sustainable Supply Chain using MICMAC Analysis" International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 67.5 (2019): 13-20.

APA Style: Sheikh Asim, Payal Bhargava(2019). Analysis of Various Enablers of Sustainable Supply Chain using MICMAC Analysis International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 67(5), 13-20.

Abstract
Industrialization has increased dramatically in recent decades. This has led to an increase in the production and consumption of various products. This rapid industrialization has seriously damaged society and the environment, in which the lack of natural resources, the production of waste during production, the increase in emissions and the amount of transport, the goods that are not eliminated at the end Product Life Cycle and Stressful Employees The work environment for these emerging issues has focused on sustainability issues and the need for sustainable supply chains to sustain this rapid economic growth in terms of environmental and social problems. In this work, we present a modeling framework to examine the different activators of sustainable supply chains, to analyze their relationships, and to propose alternatives for the development of a sustainable supply chain. In a first step, a comprehensive review of the literature will be conducted to identify the moderators and provide information on the concept of the triple end result (environmental, social and economic) of sustainability. In the second step, interpretative structural models are used to develop the relationship between several factors for each dimension of sustainability. In the third and final step, the ISM results are used as information for the analytical network process along with a possible list of alternatives to determine the best alternative (s) to develop sustainable supply chains. The proposed approach is novel and addresses an important problem of modeling enablers and alternatives for sustainable management of the supply chain. The results have a strong practical applicability and can be adapted by organizations with fewer changes in their existing work structure.

Reference
[1] Saaty, Thomas, 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill, New York, NY
[2] Warfield, J.W., 1974. Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Men and Cybernetics 4 (1), 51e81.
[3] Warfield, John, 1976, Societal Systems: Planning, Policy and Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[4] Ningwei Liu, 2006, Interpretive Structural Modeling of Interactive Risks, Call Paper Program 2006 Enterprise Risk Management Symposium Chicago, IL, pp 1-10.
[5] Raj, T., Shankar, R., Suhaib, M., 2010. An ISM approach for modeling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India. International Journal of Production Research 46 (24), 6883-6912.
[6] K. Mathiyazhagan et al., 2013, An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 47, pp 283-297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.042
[7] Jagdish R. Jadhav, Shankar S. Mantha, Santosh B. Rane, 2014. Exploring barriers in lean implementation, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 5 Iss: 2, 122–148.
[8] MilitaVienazindiene, RamuneCiarniene 2013. Lean Manufacturing Implementation and Progress Measurement, Economics and Management: 2013. 18 (2), 366-373.
[9] MariuszBednarek, Luis Fernando Niño Luna 2008. The Selected Problems of Lean Manufacturing Implementation in Mexican SMEs, in IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 257, Lean Business Systems and Beyond, Tomasz Koch, ed.; (Boston: Springer), pp. 239–247.
[10] Manoj Dora, Maneesh Kumar & Xavier Gellynck, 2016. Determinants and barriers to lean implementation in food processing SMEs. Production Planning & Control, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1–23.
[11] Shrimali, A.K., Soni, V.K., 2017. Barriers to Lean Implementation in Small and Medium-Sized Indian Enterprises, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 6, 1–9.
[12] Shrimali, A.K., Soni, V.K., 2017. A Review on Issues of Lean Manufacturing Implementation by Small and Medium Enterprises, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD), Vol. 7, Issue 3, 283-300.
[13] Usta, S.K., Asan, S.S., 2016. Analysis of Interactions among the Lean Implementation Barriers, Proceedings of the Global Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and its Applications Sreas, 20176 Intanbul Turkey, 14-15 2016, 91-99.

Keywords
Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM), MICMAC Analysis.