Integrated Product Design using Quality Function Deployment & TOPSIS

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
© 2019 by IJETT Journal
Volume-67 Issue-5
Year of Publication : 2019
Authors : JagannathAhirwar, Payal Bhargava


MLA Style: JagannathAhirwar, Payal Bhargava "Integrated Product Design using Quality Function Deployment & TOPSIS" International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 67.5 (2019): 21-26.

APA Style: JagannathAhirwar, Payal Bhargava (2019). Integrated Product Design using Quality Function Deployment & TOPSIS International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 67(5), 21-26.

QFD is a methodology, which establishes a relationship between product and customer, determines product’s sales ability and carry out it to a high level during the process. In this study, QFD methodology, which is used in several industries, was implemented in the production industry. In the first step, which is developed by the customer’s voice, Multi Criteria Decision Making was used. The relationship, which is between product and customer’s requirements, is determined by Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). After this step, with customer requirements and technical details, which is matched with, are put in the house of quality (HoQ). Fallowing these steps, improvement ratio and green parameters are taken place in the house. Finally calculate all items and evaluated.

[1] Akao, Y., 1972. New Product Development and Quality Assurance Deployment System (in Japanese). Standardization and Quality Control 25 (4), 243–246.
[2] Akao, Y. (Ed.), 1990. Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
[3] Anne Cleven, Philipp Gubler and Kai M. Hunter, 2009. “Design Alternatives for Evaluations of Design Science Research Aircrafts”, DESRIST’09, May 7-8, 2009, Malvern, PA, USA.
[4] Babak Haji Karimi and Mohamad Mehdi, 2012. “Applying a Hybrid QFD-TOPSIS Method to Design Product in the Industry”, “Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology”, 4(18): 3283-3288, 2012.
[5] Brugha C. (1998), “structuring and Weighting Criteria in Multi Criteria Decision Making”, 13th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, p. 229-242.
[6] Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota, 2008, “A Multi criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management”, International Journal of Project Management.
[7] Chensong and Chuck Zhang, 2003, “Integration of GQFD and Fuzzy Multi Attribute Utility Theory- Based cost Estimation for Environmentally Conscious Product Development”, International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Mfg. Vol. 11, 2003.
[8] Chih-Hung hsu, An-Yuan Chang and Hui-Ming Kuo, 2012, “Data mining QFD for the Dynamic Forecasting of Life Cycle under Green Supply Chain”, WSEAS Transactions of Computers, Issue 1, Volume 11, January 2012.
[9] C.P.M. Grovers, “What and How about Quality Function Deployment”, International Journal of Production Economics 46-47 (1996) 572-585.
[10] D.J. Blackwood, S. Sarkar and A.D.F. Price, 1998. “Modelling Levels of Accuracy in Design Cost Estimation”, “14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Volume 1, 330-9.
[11] F. HosseinzadehLotfi, 2011. “Ranking Efficient Units in DEA by Using TOPSIS Method”, “Applied Mathematics Science”, Vol. 5, 2011, no. 17, 805-815.
[12] F. De Felice, 2010”, “A multiple Choice Decision Analysis: An Integrated QFD-AHP Model for the Assessment of Customer Needs”,“International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology”, Vol. 2, No.9, 2012, pp. 25-38.
[13] Gregory A. Keoleian, 1993. “The Application of Life Cycle assessment to Design”, “J. Cleaner Production 1993, Volume 1, Number 3-4.
[14] Ignacio Cariaga and Hesham Osman, 2007. “Integrating Value Analysis and Quality Function Deployment for Evaluating Design Alternatives”, “Journal of Construction Engineering and management”, Vol. 133, No. 10, 2007.
[15] James S. Dyer, and Peter C., 1992. “Multi Criteria Decision Making, Multi attribute Utility Theory”, “Management Science”, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1992.
[16] Ji-Hyung Park and Kwang-KyuSeo, 2005. “A knowledge-based Approximate Life Cycle Assessment system for Evaluating EnvironmentallImpacts of Product Design Alternatives in a Collaborative Design Environment,” “Science Direct, Advance Engineering Informatics 20 (2006) 147-154.
[17] Margoluis R., Stem C., Salafsky N. and Brown M. 2009. “Design Alternatives for evaluating the impact of conservation project, “Environmental program and Policy Evaluation: Addressing Methodological Challenges, New Directions for Evaluation, 122, 85-96.
[18] M.D. Bovea and B. Wang. Integration of Customer, Cost and Environmental Requirements in Product Design: An Application of GQFD.
[19] Nai-Jen Chang and Cher-Min Fong, 2010. “ Green Product Quality, Green Corporate Image, Green Customer Satisfaction, and Green Customer Loyalty”, “ African Journal of Business Management”, Vol. 4(13), pp. 2836-2844, 2010.
[20] Ola Isaksson, Sven Keski-Seppala and Steven D. Eppinger, 2000. “Evaluation of Design Process Alternatives using Single Flow Graphs”, “Journal of Engineering Design”, ISSN 1466-1387 online 2000, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
[21] Pramen P. Shrestha and Niranjan Mani, 2012. “Impact of Design Cost on Design Bid Build Project Performance”, “Construction Research Congress”, 2012.
[22] Ralph Schafer, “Rules for Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory for Estimating a User’s Interests”, DFKI GmbH, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, 66123 Saarbrücken This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Quality Function Deployment, MCDM, TOPSIS