MotorImagery based EEG Signals Classification using MLP and KNN Classifiers

Motor-Imagery based EEG Signals Classification using MLP and KNN Classifiers

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
  
© 2021 by IJETT Journal
Volume-69 Issue-1
Year of Publication : 2021
Authors : Yogendra Narayan
DOI :  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V69I1P219

Citation 

MLA Style: Yogendra Narayan. "Motor-Imagery based EEG Signals Classification using MLP and KNN Classifiers" International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 69.1(2021):121-125. 

APA Style:Yogendra Narayan. Motor-Imagery based EEG Signals Classification using MLP and KNN Classifiers  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 69(1), 121-125.

Abstract
The electroencephalogram (EEG) signals classification plays a major role in developing assistive rehabilitation devices for physically disabled performs. In this context, EEG data were acquired from 20 healthy humans followed by the pre-processing and feature extraction process. After extracting the 12-time domain features, two well-known classifiers, namely K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP), were employed. The fivefold cross-validation approach was utilized for dividing data into training and testing purposes. The results indicated that the performance of the MLP classifier was found better than the KNN classifier. MLP classifier achieved 95% classifier accuracy, which is the best. The outcome of this study would be very useful for the online development of the EEG classification model and designing the EEG based wheelchair.

Reference
[1] A. Vourvopoulos and S. Bermúdez i Badia., Motor priming in virtual reality can augment motor-imagery training efficacy in restorative brain-computer interaction: a within-subject analysis., J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 13(1)(2016) 69.
[2] N. Hooda, R. Das, and N. Kumar., Fusion of EEG and EMG signals for classification of unilateral foot movements,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 60(2020) 101990.
[3] M. Wang, J. Hu, and H. A. Abbass., BrainPrint : EEG Biometric Identification based on Analyzing Brain Connectivity Graphs,” Pattern Recognit., 300(5)(2020) 107381.
[4] J. Ortega, J. Asensio-Cubero, J. Q. Gan, and A. Ortiz., Classification of motor imagery tasks for BCI with multiresolution analysis and multiobjective feature selection., Biomed. Eng. Online, 15(73)( 2016) S1.
[5] O. W. Samuel, Y. Geng, X. Li, and G. Li., Towards Efficient Decoding of Multiple Classes of Motor Imagery Limb Movements Based on EEG Spectral and Time Domain Descriptors., J. Med. Syst., 41(12)(2017).
[6] E. Monge-Pereira, J. Ibañez-Pereda, I. M. Alguacil-Diego, J. I. Serrano, M. P. Spottorno-Rubio, and F. Molina-Rueda, “Use of Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface Systems as a Rehabilitative Approach for Upper Limb Function After a Stroke: A Systematic Review., PM&R,9(9)(2017) 918–932.
[7] M. Kaur and V. Wasson.,ROI Based Medical Image Compression for Telemedicine Application., in Procedia Computer Science, 70(2015) 579–585.
[8] J. Minguillon, M. A. Lopez-Gordo, and F. Pelayo., Trends in EEG-BCI for daily-life: Requirements for artifact removal,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 31(2017) 407–418.
[9] According to movement intention state, Cogn, B. Kim, L. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and S. K. Yoo., Cross-association analysis of EEG and EMG signals. Syst. Res., 44(2017) 1–9.
[10] W. Y. Hsu, “Brain-computer interface connected to telemedicine and telecommunication in virtual reality applications,” Telemat. Informatics, 34(4)(2017) 224–238.
[11] S. Ç?nar and N. Ac?r, A novel system for automatic removal of ocular artifacts in EEG using outlier detection methods and independent component analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 68(2017) 36–44.
[12] Z. Yin and J. Zhang., Cross-session classification of mental workload levels using EEG and an adaptive deep learning model,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 33(2017) 30–47.
[13] A. Arunkumar et al., Classification of focal and non-focal EEG using entropies, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 94((2017) 112–117.
[14] Y. Narayan, L. Mathew, and S. Chatterji., SEMG signal classification with novel feature extraction using different machine learning approaches,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 35(5)(2018) 5099–5109.
[15] P. Martín-Smith, J. Ortega, J. Asensio-Cubero, J. Q. Gan, and A.Ortiz., A supervised filter method for multiobjective feature selection in EEG classification based on multi-resolution analysis for BCI., Neurocomputing, 250(12) 45–56.
[16] S. M. Park, X. Yu, P. Chum, W. Y. Lee, and K. B. Sim., Symmetrical feature for interpreting motor imagery EEG signals in the brain-computer interface,” Optik (Stuttg)., 129(2017) 163–171.
[17] A. Jafarifarmand, M. A. Badamchizadeh, S. Khanmohammadi, M. A. Nazari, and B. M. Tazehkand, “A new self-regulated neuro-fuzzy framework for classification of EEG signals in motor imagery BCI,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 6706, no. 99, pp. 1–11, 2017.
[18] J. Hori and N. Okada, “Classification of tactile event-related potential elicited by Braille display for the brain-computer interface,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 135–142, 2017.
[19] F. Alimardani, R. Boostani, and B. Blankertz, “Weighted spatial based geometric scheme as an efficient algorithm for analyzing single-trial EEGS to improve cue-based BCI classification,” Neural Networks, vol. 92, pp. 69–76, 2017.
[20] Y. Yang, S. Chevallier, J. Wiart, and I. Bloch, “Subject-specific time-frequency selection for multi-class motor imagery-based BCIs using few Laplacian EEG channels,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 38, pp. 302–311, 2017.
[21] N. Wang, K. Lao, and X. Zhang, “Design and Myoelectric Control of an Anthropomorphic Prosthetic Hand,” J. Bionic Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 2017.
[22] R. Zarei, J. He, S. Siuly, and Y. Zhang, “A PCA aided cross-covariance scheme for discriminative feature extraction from EEG signals,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 146, pp. 47–57, 2017.
[23] S. CINAR and N. ACIR, “A novel system for automatic removal of ocular artifacts in EEG by using outlier detection methods and independent component analysis,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 68, pp. 36–44, 2017.
[24] A. Schurger, S. Gale, O. Gozel, and O. Blanke, “Performance monitoring for brain-computer-interface actions,” Brain Cogn., vol. 111, pp. 44–50, 2017.
[25] H. Mirvaziri and Z. S. Mobarakeh, “Improvement of EEG-based motor imagery classification using ring topology-based particle swarm optimization,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 32, pp. 69–75, 2017.
[26] R. M. Cichy and D. Pantazis, “Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space,” Neuroimage, vol. 158, pp. 441–454, 2017.
[27] X. Li, O. W. Samuel, X. Zhang, H. Wang, P. Fang, and G. Li, “A motion-classification strategy based on sEMG-EEG signal combination for upper-limb amputees,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 14, no. 1, 2017.
[28] S. K. Satapathy, S. Dehuri, and A. K. Jagadev, “EEG signal classification using PSO trained RBF neural network for epilepsy identification,” Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 6, pp. 1–11, 2017.
[29] N. Hamzah, N. Zaini, M. Sani, and N. Ismail, “EEG Analysis on Actual and Imaginary Left and Right-Hand Lifting using Support Vector Machine (SVM),” Int. J. Electr. Electron. Syst. Res. EEG, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 10–17, 2017.
[30] S. Ge et al., “A Brain-Computer Interface Based on a Few-Channel EEG-fNIRS Bimodal System,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 208–218, 2017.
[31] C. Y. Sai, N. Mokhtar, H. Arof, P. Cumming, and M. Iwahashi, “Automated Classification and Removal of EEG Artifacts with SVM and Wavelet-ICA,” IEEE J. Biomed. Heal. Informatics, vol. 2194, no. c, pp. 1–1, 2017.
[32] M. Li, W. Chen, and T. Zhang, “Application of MODWT and log-normal distribution model for automatic epilepsy identification,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 679–689, 2017.
[33] A. Al-Ani, I. Koprinska, and G. Naik, “Dynamically identifying relevant EEG channels by utilizing channels classification behavior,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 83, pp. 273–282, 2017.
[34] M. Kaur, H. K. Gianey, D. Singh, and M. Sabharwal, “Multiobjective differential evolution based random forest for e-health applications,” Mod. Phys. Lett. B, vol. 33, no. 5, Feb. 2019.
[35] J. Kevric and A. Subasi, “Comparison of signal decomposition methods in classification of EEG signals for motor-imagery BCI system,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 31, pp. 398–406, 2017.

Keywords
Motor-Imagery, EEG signal, KNN, MLP, ICA, Innovation