An Approach for Determining the Accuracy of the Field CBR Value of Road Pavement Due to Ineffective Compaction
An Approach for Determining the Accuracy of the Field CBR Value of Road Pavement Due to Ineffective Compaction |
||
|
||
© 2022 by IJETT Journal | ||
Volume-70 Issue-3 |
||
Year of Publication : 2022 | ||
Authors : Noor Dhani, Ahmad Gasruddin, Hartini, La Baride, Nina Haryati |
||
https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V70I3P233 |
How to Cite?
Noor Dhani, Ahmad Gasruddin, Hartini, La Baride, Nina Haryati, "An Approach for Determining the Accuracy of the Field CBR Value of Road Pavement Due to Ineffective Compaction," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 295-301, 2022. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V70I3P233
Abstract
This paper aims to provide the simplest and most applicable method as an approach for determining the field CBR value of road pavement. Soil compaction in road foundation construction is performed differently than soil compaction in the laboratory. As a result, there were various non-uniformities in soil density and CBR values that were planned with soil density and CBR values acquired in the field after compaction. Field CBR testing is often performed at a specific range to identify the difference between soil density and CBR value. However, due to the enormous number of test points, the test would take a very long time and will be quite expensive. As a result, multiple approach methods were adopted to provide a margin of error in the disparity between the CBR value and the density of the soil in the field. The defined boundaries could be used as a guide to determine the accuracy of the compaction performed. The approach method used in this study is by comparing the results of soil investigation in the laboratory to those taken in the field at various certain points. The results of the soil investigation are then utilized to assess the performance of the compaction performed in the field. When defining the targeted CBR value, the margin specified in the comparison results could be utilized as a minimum limit value.
Keywords
Privacy, Association Rule Mining (ARM), Cloud, Apriori algorithm, Distributed system.
Reference
[1] Arbianto R, Yuono T, & Gunarso G, Comparison of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value-Based on Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). JACEE (Journal of Advanced Civil and Environmental Engineering). 4(2) (2021) 70-78.
[2] Miller K. S, Simple Field Tests for Economic Working Platform Design. In Piling 2020: Proceedings of the Piling 2020 Conference, ICE Publishing. (2021) 323-328.
[3] Abdulnabi T. Y, & Abdulrazzaq Z. G, An Estimated Correlation Between California Bearing Ratio (CBR) with Some Soil Parameters of Gypseous Silty Sandy Soils, Tikrit J. Eng. Sci. 27 (2020) 58-64.
[4] Harimei B, Analysis of Soil Bearing Capacity in Planning for Public Facilities and Infrastructure, Journal of Geocelebes. 2(1) (2018) 42-46.
[5] Darwis F, & Mulya E.R, Analysis of Basic Soil Bearing Capacity Based on the Laboratory CBR Test and Field CBR Test on the Road Segment of the Unipas Morotai Campus, Journal of Science and Engineering. 4(2) (2021) 97-105.
[6] Mueller R. O, & Hancock G. R, Structural Equation Modeling. Routledge. (2018) 445-456.
[7] Noor Dhani, L. Samang, T Harianto and A. R Djamaluddin, Characteristics Study of Over Boulder Asbuton as Pozzolanic Material for Soft Soil Stabilization. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 419 (2020) 012043.
[8] Kodikara J, Islam T, & Sounthararajah A, Review of Soil Compaction: History and Recent Developments. Transportation Geotechnics. 17 (2018) 24-34.
[9] Meehan C. L, Cacciola D. V, Tehrani F. S, & Baker III W. J, Assessing Soil Compaction Using Continuous Compaction Control and Location-Specific in Situ Tests, Automation in Construction. 73 (2017) 31-44.
[10] Rehman Z. U, Khalid U, Farooq K, & Mujtaba H, Prediction of CBR Value from Index Properties of Different Soils. Technol. J. Univ. Eng. Technol. (UET). 22 (2017) 17-26.
[11] Katte V. Y, Mfoyet S. M, Manefouet B, Wouatong A. S. L, & Bezeng L. A, Correlation of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value with Soil Properties of Road Subgrade Soil, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 37(1) (2019) 217-234.
[12] Liu Y, & Wassgren C, Modifications to Johanson`s Role Compaction Model for Improved Relative Density Predictions, Powder Technology. 297 (2016) 294-302.
[13] Srihandayani S, Soehardi F, & Putri L.D, CBR Laboratory Analysis for Determining the Number of Compaction Tracks to Achieve Field CBR. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing. 469(1) (2020) 012012.
[14] Gindorfer A, & Cornielje H, Essential Standards for CBR Field Workers. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development. 31(2) (2020).
[15] Kurnaz T. F, & Kaya Y, Prediction of the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Compacted Soils by Using a GMDH-Type Neural Network, The European Physical Journal Plus. 134(7) (2019) 326.
[16] Gül Y, & Çayir H. M, Prediction of the California Bearing Ratio from Some Field Measurements of Soils, in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, Thomas Telford Ltd. 174(4) (2021) 241-250.
[17] Kuttah D, The Strong Correlation Between the Laboratory Dynamic CBR and the Compaction Characteristics of Sandy Soil, International Journal of Geo-Engineering. 10(1) (2019) 1-13.
[18] Nugroh S. A, Value Estimation of California Bearing Ratio from Hand Cone Penetrometer Test for Pekanbaru Soils, Civil Engineering Department, University of Riau, Indonesia. (2019).
[19] Reddy C. S, & Rao E. R, A Study on Impact of Variables on Precision of Correlation Equations of CBR of Sandy Soils, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering. 9(3) (2016) 1029-1032.
[20] Hussein A. A, & Alshkane Y. M, Prediction of CBR and MR of Fine-Grained Soil Using DCPI. In Proceedings of the International Engineering Conference on Developments in Civil & Computer Engineering, Erbil, Iraq. (2018) 26-27.
[21] Marthen M. Tangkeallo, Lawalenna Samang, Achmad Bakri Muhiddin and A.R. Djamaluddin,Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Laterite Soil Stabilization using Zeolite Activated by Waterglass and Geogrid Reinforcement as Base Layer. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 15 (2020) 1496-1501.
Keywords
CBR, Field CBR, Road Pavement, Soil Density.