Binary Form of Pre-Decision- Options Leads Confidence Value in Naturalistic Decision-Making
Binary Form of Pre-Decision- Options Leads Confidence Value in Naturalistic Decision-Making |
||
 |
 |
|
| © 2024 by IJETT Journal | ||
| Volume-72 Issue-11 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Author : V. Sabapathi, E. Kamalanaban |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I11P117 | ||
How to Cite?
V. Sabapathi, E. Kamalanaban, "Binary Form of Pre-Decision- Options Leads Confidence Value in Naturalistic Decision-Making ," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 144-154, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I11P117
Abstract
Binary Pre-Decision-Making (BPDM) is crucial in understanding the intuitive and Naturalistic Decision-Making (NDM) process. In a binary decision, individuals choose between two options, streamlining the decision-making process and making it more straightforward. This study explores the inherent simplicity of BPDM and its impact on Internal Value Assessment (IAV) before making decisions. During pre-decision, BPDM serves as a filtering mechanism, influencing the dominant aspects of IAV. The cognitive association between BPDM and confidence personality metrics is examined, emphasizing the intellectual exploration of individuals within the decision-making context. The binary filtering pattern of BPDM offers advantages such as conflict avoidance, a feasible sense of decision, and an enhancement of IAV. IAV is a critical decision-making component, deeply intertwined with self-esteem and intellectual exploration. The study validates these assertions through an extensive analysis involving 510 participants who made decisions using binary and multiple-choice questions. The results, validated through binomial tests and scale reliability analysis, underscore the robust support for BPDM in the NDM process. The findings suggest that the binary pre-decision process is instrumental in thriving contexts, promoting complexity avoidance and contributing to a more confident and satisfactory final decision.
Keywords
Binary-filtering, Cognitive-systems, Decision-making, Internal assessment value, Option deduction.
References
[1] Bartosz Bartniczak, and Andrzej Raszkowski, “Sustainable Development In African Countries: An Indicator-Based Approach And Recommendations For The Future,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Sheldon M. Belenson, and Kailash C. Kapur, “An Algorithm for Solving Multicriteria on Linear Programming Problems with Examples,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 65-77, 1973.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Judy Currey, and Mari Botti, “Naturalistic Decision Making: A Model to Overcome Methodological Challenges In The Study of Critical Care Nurses’ Decision Making About Patients’ Hemodynamic Status,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 206-221, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Gemma Durán-Romero et al., “Bridging the Gap Between Circular Economy and Climate Change Mitigation Policies Through Eco-Innovations And Quintuple Helix Model,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 160, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Frank Emmert-Streib, Salisou Moutari, and Matthias Dehmer, “A Comprehensive Survey of Error Measures For Evaluating Binary Decision-Making In Data Science,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1-15, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] John Eweje, Rodney Turner, and Ralf Müller, “Maximizing Strategic Value From Megaprojects: The Influence of Information-Feed on Decision-Making by The Project Manager,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 639-651, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Piercesare Grimaldi, Hakwan Lau, and Michele A. Basso, “There Are Things That We Know That We Know, And There Are Things That We Do Not Know We Do Not Know: Confidence In Decision-Making,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, vol. 55, pp. 88-97, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Joana Geraldi, and Jonas Söderlund, “Project Studies: What it is, Where it is Going,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 55-70, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Julio Alfonso González-Mendoza, Jorge de Jesús Cañizares-Arévalo, and Maribel Cardenas-García, “Decision-Making, Rationality, and Human Action,” Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3977-3991, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Ching-Lai Hwang, and Kwangsun Yoon, “Methods For Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Multiple Attribute Decision Making,” Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol .186, pp. 58-191,1981.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Ama Lawani et al., “Naturalistic Decision-Making and Decision Drivers in the Front End of Complex Projects,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1-15, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Rolland Nicolas, “Knowledge Management Impacts the Decision-Making Process,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 20-31, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Adam Oliver, “Reflecting on Reflection: Prospect Theory, Our Behaviors, and Our Environment,” Behavioural Public Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 173-183, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Adam Oliver, “Your Money and Your Life: Risk Attitudes Over Gains And Losses,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 57, pp. 29-50, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Megan A.K. Peters, “Confidence in Decision-Making,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Arman Shahnazari et al., “Identification of Effective Factors To Select Energy Recovery Technologies From Municipal Solid Waste Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM): A Review of Thermochemical Technologies,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 40, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Herbert A. Simon, Bounded Rationality, Utility and Probability, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 15-18, 1990.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Chenghao Sun, “Research on Investment Decision-Making Model from the Perspective of “Internet of Things+ Big data,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 107, pp. 286-292, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Hamed Taherdoost, and Mitra Madanchian, “Decision making: Models, Processes, Techniques,” Cloud Computing and Data Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Rodney Turner, “How Does Governance Influence Decision-Making on Projects and In Project-Based Organizations?,” Project Management Journal, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 670-684, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Amos Tversky, and Daniel Kahneman, “Advances In Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 5, pp. 297-323, 1992.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]