Citation :

Meenal Kamlakar, Lalit Patil, Dipti D. Patil, "Multimodal Preterm Birth Prediction Using Electrohysterogram Signals and Clinical Data via a Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM Ensemble Framework," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 463-476, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P128

Abstract

Preterm delivery is one of the major contributors to mortality and morbidity among infants. Infants born prematurely are more susceptible to respiratory, neurological, and other complications that can cause developmental issues throughout their lives. It is therefore crucial to identify pregnancies at high risk of preterm delivery as early as possible to take timely interventions, reducing mortality and complications among infants. Electrohysterography, which detects the electrical activity of uterine muscles, is a promising tool for the early prediction of preterm delivery. It detects changes in uterine contractions, which are precursors to delivery. However, existing machine learning approaches for analyzing electrohysterography signals, which are based on statistical features, are inadequate for effectively extracting features from uterine muscle signals. The current research examines the application of EHG signals along with maternal clinical features for preterm birth forecasting. Specifically, a novel combination of CNN-BiLSTM networks was introduced to generate both spatial and temporal features from time-frequency EHG spectrograms. The second branch consists of extracting manually crafted EHG features and clinical features using a Random Forest classifier. At last, predictions obtained from the two branches were fused by stacking techniques. The experimental results on the TPEHGDB database achieved ROC-AUC scores of 0.88 and 0.90 for the hybrid and ensemble models, respectively.

Keywords

Preterm birth prediction, Electrohysterogram (EHG), CNN-BiLSTM, Grad-CAM, Ensemble learning.

References

[1] A.M. Fischer et al., “End-to-End Learning with Interpretation on Electrohysterography for Preterm Birth Prediction,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 158, pp. 1-15, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Ary L. Goldberger et al., “Physiobank, Physiotoolkit, and Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 23, pp. 215-220, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Marzyeh Ghassemi et al., “Opportunities in Machine Learning for Healthcare,” arXiv preprint, 2018.
[Google Scholar]

[4] Hannah Blencowe et al., “Born too Soon: THE Global Epidemiology of 15 Million Preterm Births,” Reproductive Health, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Uri Goldsztejn, and Arye Nehorai, “Predicting Preterm Births from Electrohysterogram Recordings Via Deep Learning,” PLOS One, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1-20, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Héctor Romero-Morales et al., “Enhancing Classification of Preterm-Term Birth using Continuous Wavelet Transform and Entropy-based Methods of Electrohysterogram Signals,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 13, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] G. Fele-Žorž et al., “A Comparison of Various Linear and Non-Linear Signal Processing Techniques to Separate Uterine EMG Records of Term and Pre-Term Delivery Groups,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 911-922 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Franc Jager, “An Open Dataset with Electrohysterogram Records of Pregnancies Ending in Induced and Cesarean Section Delivery,” Scientific Data, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Franc Jager, “Term-Preterm EHG Database,” PhysioNet, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]

[10] Janusz Jezewski et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Contraction Patterns in Electrical Activity Signal of Pregnant Uterus as an Alternative to Mechanical Approach,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 753-767, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Paul Fergus et al., “Prediction of Preterm Deliveries from Electrohysterogram Signals using Machine Learning,” PLOS One, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1-16, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Qiyang Sun, Alican Akman, and Björn W. Schuller, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications: A Review,” ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-31, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Somayeh Mohammadi Far et al., “Prediction of Preterm Labor from the Electrohysterogram Signals based on Different Gestational Weeks,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 1-13, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Yoon Jae Lee et al., “Artificial Intelligence on Biomedical Signals: Technologies, Applications, and Future Directions,” Med-X, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-30, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Mohamad Khalil, and Jacques Duchene “Uterine EMG Analysis: A Dynamic Approach for Change Detection and Classification,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 748-756, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Tomasz Włodarczyk et al., “Machine Learning Methods for Preterm Birth Prediction: A Review,” Electronics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-24, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Félix Nieto-del-Amor et al., “Automatic Semantic Segmentation of EHG Recordings by Deep Learning: An Approach to a Screening Tool for use in Clinical Practice,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 254, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Liwen Ding et al., “Prediction of Preterm Birth using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis based on Large-Scale Preschool Children Survey Data in Shenzhen of China,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Qiu-Yan Yu et al., “Predicting Risk of Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancies using Machine Learning Algorithms,” Frontiers in Big Data, vol. 7, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju et al., “Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks Via Gradient-based Localization,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 336-359, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] Raden Topan Aditya Rahman et al., “Proposed Model to Predict Preeclampsia using Machine Learning Approach,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 694-702, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Yu Chen et al., “Development and Validation of a Spontaneous Preterm Birth Risk Prediction Algorithm based on Maternal Bioinformatics: A Single-Center Retrospective Study,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]