Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 7 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I7P132 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P132XCalibYieldAI: A Dual-Stage Explainable and Calibrated Deep Learning Framework for Crop Yield Forecasting
Yedukondalu Gamidelli, Mousmi Ajay Chaurasia, S Nallusamy
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Mar 2026 | 18 May 2026 | 20 Jun 2026 | 28 Jul 2026 |
Citation :
Yedukondalu Gamidelli, Mousmi Ajay Chaurasia, S Nallusamy, "XCalibYieldAI: A Dual-Stage Explainable and Calibrated Deep Learning Framework for Crop Yield Forecasting," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 547-583, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I7P132
Abstract
Crop yield forecasting is an essential approach for providing accurate and interpretable information to facilitate food security, resource allocation, and Policy-Making in agriculture. Limitations in capacity for regional calibration, transparency, and generalisation are common issues for many traditional statistical methods and Black-Box deep learning models, hindering proper adaptability across heterogeneous Agro-Climatic zones. In addition, the predictions of most current models are not interpretable, therefore less trustworthy and unusable in practice. To fill these gaps, we proposed a Two-Stage deep learning framework, called XCalibYieldAI, which aims to maximise both prediction accuracy and interpretability for crop yield. The proposed method combines attention-based temporal modelling with Region-Specific calibration and explainable AI methods, including SHAP value analysis, temporal attention visualisation, and geospatial overlays. They collectively maximise spectral, atmospheric, and vegetation information while also accommodating regional differences in crop phenology and climate. Multi-season remote sensing datasets, with a case study over the continental USA, show that the proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art CNN, LSTM, and Transformer baselines, resulting in statistically significant improvements in macro accuracy (up to 92.4%) and R² scores. This enhances stakeholder confidence by providing actionable visual explainability through measures of the temporal importance of crop growth stages and the spatial heterogeneity of yield across yield zones. This new XCalibYieldAI framework addresses the critical Trade-Off between crop yield models that are scalable across large areas and highly generalisable, and those that enable complex deep learning predictions to drive agronomic decisions. This acts as an accessible, Open-Source, and Data-Driven platform for contemporary precision agriculture use cases.
Keywords
Crop Yield Forecasting, Explainable AI, Temporal Attention, Regional Calibration, Remote Sensing Data.
References
[1] Ivan Malashin et al., “Predicting Sustainable Crop Yields: Deep Learning
and Explainable AI Tools,” Sustainability, vol. 16,
no. 21, pp. 1-29, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Olympia Kourounioti et al.,
“UAVINE-XAI: Explainable AI-based
Spectral Band Selection for Vineyard Monitoring using UAV Hyperspectral
Data,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth
Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 18, pp. 10095-10104, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] R.N.V. Jagan Mohan, Pravallika Sree Rayanoothala, and R. Praneetha Sree,
“Next-Gen Agriculture Integrating AI and XAI for Precision Crop Yield
Predictions,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 15, pp. 1-16, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Faizan Ali et al., “Spectral Intelligence: AI-Driven Hyperspectral
Imaging for Agricultural and Ecosystem Applications,” Agronomy, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1-24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Sungwook Yoon, “Advanced Machine Learning Approaches for High-Precision
Yield Prediction using Multi-Temporal Spectral Data in Smart Far,” International
Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 335-344, 2024.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Guyang Zhang, and Waleed Abdulla, “Explainable AI-Driven Wavelength
Selection for Hyperspectral Imaging of Honey Products,” Food
Chemistry Advances, vol. 3, pp. 1-9, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Hiba Najjar et al., “Explainability of Subfield Level Crop Yield
Prediction using Remote Sensing,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth
Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 18, pp. 4141-4161, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Dipika Laxman Tidke et al.,
“Advances in Crop Yield Prediction through Machine Learning and Deep Learning
Insights into Yield Estimation,” International Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 11, no. 18s, pp. 532-543,
2025.
[Publisher Link]
[9] Md. Toukir Ahmed, and Mohammed Kamruzzaman, “Enhancing Corn Quality
Prediction: Variable Selection and Explainable AI in Spectroscopic
Analysis,” Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 8, pp. 1-11, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Abhasha Joshi et al.,
“Remote-Sensing Data and Deep-Learning Techniques in Crop Mapping and Yield
Prediction: A Systematic Review,” Remote
Sensing, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1-26. 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Koushik Nagasubramanian et al.,
“Plant Disease Identification using Explainable 3D Deep Learning on
Hyperspectral Images,” Plant Methods, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-10,
2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Nadir El Bouanani et al.,
“Estimating Soil Attributes for Yield Gap Reduction in Africa using
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data with Artificial Intelligence Methods: An Extensive
Review and Synthesis,” Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1-47, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Chandan Kumar et al., “Multi-Stage
Corn Yield Prediction using High-Resolution UAV Multispectral Data and Machine
Learning Models,” Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1-22, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Md. Abu Jabeda, and Masrah Azrifah
Azmi Murad, “Crop Yield Prediction in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches, with Insights for Future
Research and Sustainability,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 24, pp. 1-19, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Soo Been Cho et al., “Recent
Methods for Evaluating Crop Water Stress using AI Techniques: A Review,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 1-39, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Anuradha Yenkikar et al., “An
Explainable AI-based Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Interpretability and
Enhanced Crop Yield Prediction,” MethodsX, vol. 15, pp. 1-13, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Mahmoud Y. Shams, Samah A. Gamel,
and Fatma M. Talaat, “Enhancing Crop Recommendation Systems with Explainable
Artificial Intelligence: A Study on Agricultural Decision-Making,” Neural
Computing and Applications, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 5695-5714, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Tomoaki Yamaguchi et al., “A Study
on Optimal Input Images for Rice Yield Prediction Models using CNN with UAV
Imagery and its Reasoning using Explainable AI,” European
Journal of Agronomy, vol. 164, pp. 1-12, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Abid Badshah et al., “Crop
Classification and Yield Prediction using Robust Machine Learning Models for
Agricultural Sustainability,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 162799-162813, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Lakindu Mampitiya et al.,
“Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Estimate the Sri Lankan (Ceylon) Tea
Crop Yield,” Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 11, pp. 1-10, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Tanjim Mahmud et al., “An Approach
for Crop Prediction in Agriculture: Integrating Genetic Algorithms and Machine
Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 173583-173598, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Ishaan Seshukumar Pothapragada, and
Sujatha R, “Gans for Data Augmentation with Stacked CNN Models and XAI for
Interpretable Maize Yield Prediction,” Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 11, pp. 1-13, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] MD Rokibul Hasan, “AI and Machine
Learning for Optimal Crop Yield Optimization in the USA,” Journal
of Computer Science and Technology Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 48-61, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] S. Jayanthi et al., “Investigation
of Explainable Crop Yield Prediction: Leveraging Ensemble earning and a Novel
Blend Model Approach,” Research Square, pp. 1-35, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Dilli Paudel et al.,
“Interpretability of Deep Learning Models for Crop Yield Forecasting,” Computers
and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 206, pp. 1-14, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Hari Sankar Nayak et al.,
“Interpretable Machine Learning Methods to Explain On-Farm Yield Variability of
High Productivity Wheat in Northwest India,” Field Crops Research, vol. 287, pp. 1-14, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Masahiro Ryo, “Explainable
Artificial Intelligence and Interpretable Machine Learning for Agricultural
Data Analysis,” Artificial Intelligence in
Agriculture, vol. 6, pp. 257-265, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Anna Mateo-Sanchis et al.,
“Learning Main Drivers of Crop Progress and Failure in Europe with
Interpretable Machine Learning,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observations
and Geoinformation, vol. 104, pp. 1-11, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Valeriy Shevchenko et al., “Climate
Change Impact on Agricultural Land Suitability: An Interpretable Machine
Learning-based Eurasia Case Study,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 15748-15763, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Peter B. Gibson et al., “Training Machine
Learning Models on Climate Model Output Yields Skillful Interpretable Seasonal
Precipitation Forecasts,” Communications Earth and Environment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Theodoros Petropoulos et al.,
“Interpretable Machine Learning for Legume Yield Prediction using Satellite
Remote Sensing Data,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1-18, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Yuanyuan Liu et al., “Rice Yield
Prediction and Model Interpretation based on Satellite and Climatic Indicators
using a Transformer Method,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 1-21,
2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Ruolei Zeng et al.,
“Crossformer-based Model for Predicting and Interpreting Crop Yield Variations
under Diverse Climatic and Agricultural Conditions,” Agriculture, vol.
15, no. 9, pp. 1-26, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Mohsen Shahhosseini et al.,
“Coupling Machine Learning and Crop Modeling Improves Crop Yield Prediction in
the US Corn Belt,” Scientifc Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Akshar Tripathi, Reet Kamal Tiwari,
and Surya Prakash Tiwari, “A Deep Learning Multi-Layer Perceptron and Remote
Sensing Approach for Soil Health based Crop Yield Estimation,” International
Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation,” vol. 113, pp. 1-12, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Xiufang Zhu et al., “Crop Yield
Prediction based on Agrometeorological Indexes and Remote Sensing Data,” Remote
Sensing, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1-25, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Petteri Nevavuori, Nathaniel Narra,
and Tarmo Lipping, “Crop Yield Prediction with Deep Convolutional Neural
Networks,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 163, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Kai-Yun Li et al., “Toward
Automated Machine Learning-based Hyperspectral Image Analysis in Crop Yield and
Biomass Estimation,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1-26, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Xin Du et al., “Remote
Sensing-based Winter Wheat Yield Estimation Integrating Machine Learning and
Crop Growth Multi-Scenario Simulation,” International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Qazi Mudassar Ilyas, Muneer Ahmad,
and Abid Mehmood, “Automated Estimation of Crop Yield using Artificial
Intelligence and Remote Sensing Technologies,” Bioengineering, vol. 10,
no. 2, pp.1-24, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Meha Jain et al., “Mapping Smallholder Wheat Yields
and Sowing Dates using Micro-Satellite Data,” Remote Sensing, vol. 8,
no. 10, pp. 1-18, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] USGS Earth Explorer, Landsat 8 Surface Reflectance
Tier 1 Data Product, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
[43] Kamel Didan, “MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day
L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006,” NASA Earth Data, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Gridded
Daily Rainfall and Temperature Dataset, Indian Meteorological Department (IMD),
2024. [Online]. Available: https://mausam.imd.gov.in
[45] Sentinel-2, European Space Agency, 2023. [Online]. Available:
https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-2