Developing a Hybrid Multi Population Genetic Algorithm for the Dynamic Facility Layout Problem with Budget Constraint
Citation
Dileep K S, Prof. Cijo Mathew, Prof. (Dr.) Biju B"Developing a Hybrid Multi Population Genetic Algorithm for the Dynamic Facility Layout Problem with Budget Constraint", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V29(5),227-231 November 2015. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group
Abstract
Complexity has always been a major issue
to develop a solution algorithm for dynamic facility
layout problem. Many researchers have proposed
different algorithms for dynamic facility layout
problem. From literature survey it was realized that
the performance of the algorithm can be further
boosted by a more intelligent search. This work
develops an effective hybrid multi-population genetic
algorithm to solve dynamic facility layout problem.
Using a suggested heuristic procedure, to intensify the
search, a powerful local search mechanism based on
simulated annealing is created. The proposed
algorithm helps to save the computational time by
skipping infeasible space. The proposed multi
population genetic simulated annealing algorithm is
compared with the results from dynamic facility layout
problem with budget constraint proposed by Parham
Azimi, Hamid Reza Charmchi [16] for different
benchmark problem instances from Balakrishnan and
Cheng [6]. The proposed algorithm provides good
results for the problems under consideration with reduced
computational time.
References
[1] M.J. Rosenblatt, The dynamics of plant layout, Manag. Sci.
32 (1) (1986) 76–86.
[2] T.L. Urban, A heuristic for the dynamic facility layout
problem, IIE Trans. 25 (4) (1993) 57–63.
[3] J. Balakrishnan, C.H. Cheng, Genetic search and the dynamic
layout problem, Comput. Oper. Res. 27 (6) (2000) 587–593.
[4] T.A. Lacksonen, E.E. Enscore, Quadratic assignment
algorithms for the dynamic layout problem, Int. J. Prod. Res.
31 (3) (1993) 503–517.
[5] D.G. Conway, M.A. Venkataramanan, Genetic search and the
dynamic facility layout problem, Comput. Oper. Res. 21 (8)
(1994) 955–960.
[6] J. Balakrishnan, C.H. Cheng, Genetic search and the dynamic
layout problem,Comput. Oper. Res. 27 (6) (2000) 587–593.
[7] B.K. Kaku, J.B. Mazzola, A tabu-search heuristic for the
dynamic plant layout problem, INFORMS J. Comput. 9 (4)
(1997) 374–384.
[8] A. Baykasoglu, N.N.Z. Gindy, A simulated annealing
algorithm for dynamic lay-out problem, Comput. Oper. Res.
28 (2001) 1403–1426.
[9] E. Erel, J.B. Ghosh, J.T. Simon, New heuristic for the
dynamic layout problem, J.Oper. Res. Soc. 54 (2003) 1275–
1282.
[10] J.M. Rodriguez, F.C. MacPhee, D.J. Bonham, V.C. Bhavsar,
Solving the dynamic plant layout problem using a new hybrid
meta-heuristic algorithm, Int. J. High Perform. Comput.
Netw. 4 (5/6) (2006) 286–294.
[11] J. Balakrishnan, C.H. Cheng, The dynamic plant layout
problem: Incorporating rolling horizons and forecast
uncertainty, Omega 37 (2009) 165–177.
[12] R. Sahin, O. Turkbey, A new hybrid tabu-simulated
annealing heuristic for the dynamic facility layout problem,
Int. J. Prod. Res. 47 (24) (2009)6855–6873.
[13] Hani Pourvaziri, B. Naderi, A hybrid multi population
genetic algorithm for the dynamic facility layout problem,
Applied Soft Computing 24 (2014) 457-469.
[14] Goldberg D.E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search,
Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley
Publishers, Massachusetts.
[15] Francis R. A. and White J. A. (1972) Facility layout and
location: an analytical approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
[16] Parham Azimi, Reza Charmchi, A new optimization
approach for dynamic facility layout with budget constraint,
Oper. Res. 168 (2) (2012) 57–89.
[17] Wei Xie, Nikolaos V. Sahinidis, A branch-and-bound
algorithm for the continuous facility layout problem,
Computers and Chemical Engineering 32 (2008) 1016–1028
[18] Yavuz A. Bozer, Suk-Chul Rim, (1996). A branch and bound
method for solving the bidirectional circular layout problem,
Appl. Math. Modeling Res.12 (7) (1996) 342-351.
Keywords
Dynamic facility layout problem,
computational time, Material handling cost, Rearrangement
cost, Budget constraint.