Comparative Analysis of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols for Improving Quality of Service in Mobile AdHoc Networks

Comparative Analysis of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols for Improving Quality of Service in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
  
© 2015 by IJETT Journal
Volume-30 Number-4
Year of Publication : 2015
Authors : Divya Bandral, Reena Aggarwal
DOI :  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V30P237

Citation 

Divya Bandral, Reena Aggarwal"Comparative Analysis of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols for Improving Quality of Service in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V30(4),192-196 December 2015. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group

Abstract
A Manet is set of wireless mobile nodes that communicate with each other without any dynamic infrastructure or centralized supervision. Each mobile node act as a router which forwards the packets to destination by first sending the packet to the nearest hop, various routing protocol are designed for this purpose. Selecting an appropriate routing protocol holds a significant position in the performance evaluation of wireless network. This paper aims to analyse and compare the performance of well- known On-demand routing protocols Ad hoc On demand Distance Vector (AODV), Table-driven routing protocol Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) and Hybrid routing protocol Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP).The simulation environment used for these protocols is Network Simulator 2 (NS- 2). The performance of the three routing protocols is analysed with respect to throughput, minimum delay and routing overhead. The major goal of this study is to analyse the performance of popular MANETs routing protocol.

 References

[1] T. K. Araghi, M. Zamani, A. BT Abdul Mnaf, “Performance Analysis in Reactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc networks Using DSR, AODV and AOMDV”, International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia ,IEEE, pp 81-84,2013
[2] R. Desai, B. P. Patil, “Analysis of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks”, International Conference on Circuits, System, Communication and Information Technology Applications (CSCITA) IEEE , pp 111-115, 2014.
[3] B. S. Gouda, D. Patro, R. K. Shial, “Scenario-Based Performance Evaluation of Proactive Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocol in Manets Using Raydom Waypoint Model”, International Conference on Information Technology,IEEE,pp 47-52, 2014.
[4] P. Sarkar and H. Paul, “Comparative Performance Analysis of GZRP, AOMDV and DSR in Manets”, Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Information Technology (CIIT) ,pp 175-178, 2013.
[5] S. Gandhi, N. Chaubey, N. Tada, S. Trivedi, “Scenario Based Performance Comparison of Reactive Proactive and Hybrid Protocols in MANET”, International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI- 2012),IEEE
[6] R. Rohankar, R. Bhatia, V. Shrivastva, D. K. Sharma, “Performance Analysis of Various Routing Protocols (Proactive and Reactive) for Random Mobility Models of Adhoc Networks”, Ist International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT- 2012), IEEE.
[7] N. K. Agarwal, V. Shrivastava, “Simulation Results and Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol in Mobile Ad- Hoc Network”, International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering (IJESE), Volume-1, Issue-7, pp 25-28, May 2013.
[8] Md. A. Rahman, F. Anwar, J. Naeem, Md. S. Minhazul Abedin, “A Simulation Based Performance Comparison of Routing Protocol on Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid)”, International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE 2010), IEEE.
[9] A. K. Gupta, H. Sadawarti, A. K. Verma, “Review of Various Routing Protocols for Mantes”, International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp 251-259, November 2011.
[10] P. S. Kumar and S. Ramachandram, “Comparitive Performance Analysis of GZRP and AOMDV in MANETs”,Second Vaagdevi International Conference on Information Techonology for Real World Problems, pp 52- 56, 2010.
[11] S. Mittal and P. Kaur, “Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET’S”, International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control and Telecommunication Technologies, IEEE, pp 165-168, 2009.
[12] Z. Huawei and Z. Yun, “Comparison and Analysis AODV and OLSR Routing Protocols in Ad-Hoc Network”, Wirless communications, Networking and Mobile Computing,2008. WiCOM ’08. 4th International Conference, IEEE.
[13] S. Shah, A. Khandre, M. shirole, G. Bhole, “Performance Evaluation of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols Using NS2 Simulation”, Mobile and Pervasive Computing (CoMPC- 2008).
[14] Q. Feng, Z. Cai, J. Yang, X. hu, “A Performance comparison of the ad hoc network protocols”, Second International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering, IEEE, pp 293-297,2009.
[15] Z. J. Hass, M. R. Pearlman, P. Samar, “The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) for Ad Hoc Networks”, draft-ietf-manetzone- zrp-04.txt, 2002.
[16] M. Malik, “On Demand Routing Protocols in Mobile Networks”, International Journal of Research in Science and Technology (ijrst), vol. 1, 2012.
[17] J. Jacob and V. Seethalakshmi, “Performance Evaluation of Various Routing Protocols in MANET”, International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 5, pp. 208-220, 2011.
[18] C. Siva Ram Murthy and B. S. Manoj, “Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, Architectures and Protocols”, Pearson Education, 2004.
[19] F. Anwar, Md. S. Azad, Md. A. Rahman, and M. M. Uddin (2008), “Performance Analysis of Ad hoc Routing Protocols in Mobile WiMAX Environment”, IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, Volume 35, Issue 3, September 2008, ISSN 1819-656X, pp 353-360.
[20] C. E. Perkins, “Ad hoc Networking”, Pearson Publication.

Keywords
AODV, DSDV, MANET, Quality of service, ZRP.