Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Routing Protocols for Real time application

  IJETT-book-cover  International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)          
© 2016 by IJETT Journal
Volume-32 Number-7
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : ShewayeSirika, SmitaMahajine
DOI :  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V32P263


ShewayeSirika, SmitaMahajine"Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Routing Protocols for Real time application", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V32(7),328-337 February 2016. ISSN:2231-5381. published by seventh sense research group

In network communication, choosing the best path to send packets from source and destination is the first task to make sure the quality of communication. To do so the process called routing is held on the device router by following Routing algorithms. There are two categories of routing process: static routing, which is done manually by the administrator and dynamic routing, which is done automatically by using some routing protocols. The main target of this paper is to study the deep understanding of Interior Gateway routing protocols like RIP, EIGRP and OSPF and to compare their performance in real-time application VOIP, Video conferencing based on convergence, end to end packet delay, packet delay variation and queuing delay by using Cisco packet tracer and OPNET simulators. Our goal is to show which protocol performs better in real time application.


[1] Circiumarescu, L.D.; Predusca, G. ; Angelescu, N. ; Puchianu, D.,” Comparative evaluation of Protocol RIP, OSPF, EIGRP and IGRP for carrier Video Conferencing, e-mail, FTP, HTTP”, Control systems and PC technology (CSCS), 2015 20th worldwide convention on, pp. 584 – 589, 2015.
[2] O`Halloran, C.;” Dynamic variation of OSPF interface metrics based totally on community load”, signals and systems convention (ISSC), 2015 26th Irish, pp. 1 – 6, 2015.
[3] Jaya Kumar, M.,” A comparative study on RIP and OSPF protocols”, Innovations in statistics, Embedded and conversation structures (ICIIECS), pp. 1-5, 2015.
[4] Dipti Chauhan, Sanjay Sharma, “performance evaluation of different Routing Protocols in IPv4 and IPv6 Networks on the idea of Packet Sizes” Procedia computer science volume 46, pp. 1072 – 1078, 2015.
[5] Archana C” evaluation of RIPv2, OSPF, EIGRP Configuration on router the usage of CISCO Packet tracer”, International journal of Engineering science and innovative technology (IJESIT) volume 4, issue 2, pp. 215-222, March 2015
[6] Jha, C.ok. ; Kumar, P.; Parihar, P.D. ; Garg, L., “Realization of link state Routing Protocol and improve Distance Vector in extraordinary IP Schema”, Computational Intelligence and communication Networks (CICN), 2014 global convention on, pp. 486 – 491,2014.
[7] Naresh; Kumar, A.,” performance evaluation of UMTS under OSPF, EIGRP and IGRP”, Computing for Sustainable global development (INDIA Com), 2014 international conference on, pp. 934 – 938, 2014.
[8] Prachi Thakur, Yogesh Bansal,” Survey of IP Routing Protocols”, International journal of advanced research in computer science and software Engineering volume 4, issue 7, pp. 252-258,2014.
[9] Moh`d Rasoul Ahmad Al-Hadidi, Mohammed Yousef Al- Gawagzeh, Nayel Al-Zubi, Bayan Al-Saaidah and Mohammed Alweshah, ”overall performance analysis of EIGRP via OSPF based on OPNET and GNS3”, Research journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and technology 8 (eight), pp. 989-994, 2014.
[10] Yunos, R.; Ahmad, S.A. ; Noor, N.M.; Saidi, R.M eleven.,” evaluation of Routing Protocols of VoIP, VPN over MPLS network”, systems, process & control (ICSPC), 2013 IEEE convention on, pp. 139 – 143, 2013.
[12] Wikipedia

RIP, EIGRP, OSPF, VOIP, Video conferencing, Cisco packet tracer, OPNET.