Applying the KAIZEN Philosophy for building the Business Success in Indian Small & Medium Manufacturing Enterprises
|International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)||
|© 2017 by IJETT Journal|
|Year of Publication : 2017|
|Authors : Harvinder Lal, Manpreet Singh
|DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V43P217|
Harvinder Lal, Manpreet Singh "Applying the KAIZEN Philosophy for building the Business Success in Indian Small & Medium Manufacturing Enterprises", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V43(2),102-108 January 2017. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group
The Kaizen management originated in the best Japanese management practices and is dedicated to the improvement of productivity, efficiency, quality and, in general, of business excellence. The KAIZEN methods are internationally acknowledged as methods of continuous improvement, through small steps, of the economical results of companies. The small improvements applied to key processes will generate the major multiplication of the company’s profit, while constituting a secure way to obtain the clients’ loyalty/fidelity. The KAIZEN management represents a solid, strategic instrument, with a view to reach and surpass the company’s objectives. With Globalization, today’s markets economy has posed new challenges to all manufacturing organizations irrespective of their size and infrastructure for effective use of continuous improvement strategies for sustaining their enhanced productivity. This study attempts to assess the performance of various continuous improvement strategies for strategic success by using AHP and VIKOR. Results of investigation demonstrated that customer relationship plays a most significant role in improving the performance of manufacturing organizations. The overall success rate of CI strategies for enhancing the performance of organization is about 73 percent.
1. Singh, K. and Ahuja, I.P. S. (2012) ‘Justification of TQM– TPM implementations in manufacturing organisations using analytical hierarchy process: a decision-making approach under uncertainty’, Int. J. Productivity and Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.69–84.
2. Dangayach, G.S., Pathak, S.C. and Sharma, A.D. (2006), “Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A way of improving technological competitiveness”, International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp.1-8.
3. Sardana, G.D. and Sinha, S.K. (2011) ‘Enhancing firm competitiveness in fast track through total productive maintenance’, Int. J. Indian Culture and Business Management, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.88–103.
4. Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1980.
5. Saaty, T.L. (1994). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
6. Russel JS. Contractor failure: analysis. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE 1991;5(3):163±80.
7. Saaty, T.L. and Ozdemir, M. (2003) “Why the Magic Number Seven Plus or Minus Two”, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 38: 233-244.
8. Belton, V. and Gear, T. (1983). On a Short-coming of Saaty`s Method of Analytic Hierarchies. Omega, 228-230.
9. Saaty, T.L., and Gholamnezhad, H. (1982), ‘High-level nuclear waste management: analysis of options’, Environment and Planning B, 9(1): 181-196.
10. Cheng, E.W.L. and Li, H. (2001) ‘Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)’, Information Management and Computer Security, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.61–70.
11. Katayama, H. and Bennett, D.J. (1999) ‘Agility, adaptability and leanness: a comparison of concepts and a study of practice’, Int. J. Production Economics, Vols. 60/61, pp.43– 51.
12. Singh, H. and Kumar, R. (2011) , “Two phase methodology for effective utilization of advanced manufacturing technologies using AHP and VIKOR” National Conference on Advancements and Futuristic Trends in Mechanical and Materials Engineering (Oct. 7-8,2011), pp. 5-11.
KAIZEN, Globalization and Productivity etc.