Structural Performance of Square Hollow Structural Steel (Shs) Tubular Section under Axial Load using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Fabrics
|International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)||
|© 2017 by IJETT Journal|
|Year of Publication : 2017|
|Authors : K.Ranjith, A.Abdul Ajeez, P.Balagurunathan
|DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V47P248|
K.Ranjith, A.Abdul Ajeez, P.Balagurunathan "Structural Performance of Square Hollow Structural Steel (Shs) Tubular Section under Axial Load using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Fabrics", International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), V47(5),295-302 May 2017. ISSN:2231-5381. www.ijettjournal.org. published by seventh sense research group
Square Hollow Section (SHS) have been used for many years in highway signs, guard rails, power transmission towers, oil rigs and other structures. Because of its high strength-to-weight ratios, excellent compression support characteristics and excellent torsional resistance, is now used in construction industry. Traditionally, the most common method to repair and/or rehabilitate a steel structure has been by welding additional steel plates. This not only adds weight to the structure, but the heat involved in welding can affect the stress distribution and may be critical for structures exposed to fatigue loads. In addition, steel plates would be exposed to corrosion damage and frequently this repairing method requires the use of scaffolding and heavy machinery as well as long periods of service interruption. In contrast, rehabilitation methods using carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites do not exhibit any of these drawbacks. The advantages of CFRP over steel plates are the low weight of the bonded material, easy applicability and the capacity to cover areas with limited access.
1. Whittle R. Failures in concrete structures - case studies in
reinforced and prestressed concrete. FL 33487-2742: CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group; 2013.
2. Gosbell T, Meggs R. West gate bridge approach spans FRP strengthening Melbourne. In: Proceedings, IABSE symposium, Melbourne, Australia; 2002.
3. Holman JW, Cook JP. Steel plates for torsion repair of concrete beams. Structural Eng ASCE 1984;110(1):10–8.
4. Ye JH, Zhao XL, Van Binh D, Al-Mahaidi R. Plastic mechanism analysis of fabricated square and triangular sections under axial compression. Thin Wall Structural 2007;45(2):135–48.
5. Bambach MR, Elchalakani M. Plastic mechanism analysis of steel SHS strengthened with CFRP under large axial deformation. Thin Wall Structures 2007;45(2):159–70.
6. FernandoND,TengJG,YuT,ZhaoXL.Finite element modeling of CFRP strengthened rectangular steel tube subjected to end bearing loads.In:Smith ST,editor.First Asia Pacific conference on FRP in structures(APFIS2007).HongKong,China,2007.p.943–50.
7. Hadi MNS. Comparative study of eccentrically loaded FRP wrapped columns. Journal of Composite Structural 2006;74(2):127– 35.
SHS, CFRP, FABRICS, REHABILITATION.