An Experimental Comparison Between Actual Valve and Benchmark Valve Using Modified Design and Optimized Design
MLA Style: Saleh Ahmed, Hossein Emadi, Lloyd Heinze, Khalid Elwegaa, Fathi Elldakli "An Experimental Comparison Between Actual Valve and Benchmark Valve Using Modified Design and Optimized Design" International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 68.2 (2020):64-73.
APA Style:Saleh Ahmed, Hossein Emadi, Lloyd Heinze, Khalid Elwegaa, Fathi Elldakli. An Experimental Comparison Between Actual Valve and Benchmark Valve Using Modified Design and Optimized Design International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 68(2),64-73.
Actual gas lift valve and Benchmark valve are both being used in gas lift to inject gas and maximize the oil production. These valves contain several components and the only adjustable components are the ball and the seat. Previous experimental studies on gas lift performance have examined only a few parameters at a time. To provide a more complete overview of the process, this study compares the performance of actual valve and Benchmark valve using different seats and ball sizes atinjection pressure of 600 psi. Twoseat designs were investigated in this experimental study: modified and optimized seat designs. The effects of ball diameters, Port Top Diameter (PTD) and Port Bottom Diameter (PBD) for modified and optimized seat designs were examined. 16 seat sizes and 6 different ball sizes were used for both actual valve and benchmark valve to investigate the best gas throughput. The results of lab studiesshow that actual valve is better than benchmark valve in terms of gas throughput. The gas flow rate using actual valve was higher than using benchmark valve by between 35% to 40% for the optimized and modified designs respectively. The results also show that the best case in modified and optimized design using Benchmarkvalve and actual valve individuallyis when Port Bottom Diameter (PBD) 6/16inch, Port Top Diameter (PTD) 8/16 inch with ball size 7/16 inch (1/16 in smaller than PTD). The best ball and seat design of the optimized design using actual gas lift valve could be implemented in field application to improve the oil production.
 Ehsanul Kabir, (2017), Investigating effects of ball size on the performance of gas lift valve for both modified and optimized seats, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 73(1):15
 Ehsanul Kabir, (2018), Optimizing Seat and Ball Combination of Actual Gas Lift Valve: An Experimental and CFD Simulation Study. Texas Tech University
 Elldakli, F., Soliman, M., Shahri, M., 2014a. Enhanced Gas Lift Valve Performance with Sharp Edged Seat Using Larger Balls, in: Southwestern Petroleum Short Course. Lubbock, Texas, USA.
 Elldakli, F., Soliman, M.Y., Shahri, M., Winkler, H.W., Gamadi, T.D., 2014b. Improved Gas Lift Valve Performance Using a Modified Design for GLV Seat, in: SPE Artificial Lift Conference & Exhibition-North America. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, Texas, USA.https://doi.org/10.2118/171342-MS
 Decker, A. L., et al. (1976). Analytical methods for determining pressure response of bellows operated valves.
 Decker, K., et al. (1986). Computer modeling of gas-lift valve performance. In Offshore technologyconference.
 Kulkarni, M. (2005). Gas lift valve modeling with orifice effects. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Texas Tech University., Lubbock
 Shahri, M. A. (2011). Simplified and rapid method for determining flow characteristics of every gas-lift valve (glv) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University.
 Winkler, H., Camp, G., et al. (1987). Dynamic performance testing of single-element unbalanced gas-lift valves. SPE Production Engineering, 2(03), 183–190.
 Brown, K. 1973. Gas Lift Theory and Practice. P.202
 Winkler, W., &Blann, J. (2007). Petroleum engineering handbook, chapter 11. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
 Aliyeva, F., &Novruzaliyev, B. 2015. Gas Lift – Fast and Furious. In proceedings of the SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference & Exhibition.
 King, W. (1944, January 18). Time and volume control for gas. Google Patents. (US Patent 2,339,487).
 Xu, Z., Richard, B. M., &Kritzler, J. H. (2013, September 30). Smart Gas Lift Valves Enhance Operation Efficiency of Offshore Wells. In proceedings of the Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition.
 Acuna, H.G., 1989. Normalization of One-Inch Nitrogen Charged Pressure Operated GasLift Valves. Tulsa University.
 Kolawole O., Gamadi T., and Bullard D. (2019). Artificial Lift System Applications in Tight Formations: The State of Knowledge. SPE Production & Operations, SPE-196592-PA.
 Almeida, A.R., 2011. A Model to Calculate the Theoretical Critical Flow Rate Through Venturi Gas Lift Valves (includes Addendum). SPE J. 16, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.2118/126184-PA
 FathiElldakli (2017) Testing, Modeling and Optimizing a Modified Design of Gas Lift Valve Seat. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University.
 Bertovic, D., 1995. A Unified Model for Gas-Lift Valve Performance Incorporating Temperature Effects. Tulsa University.
 Elldakli, F., Soliman, M., 2017. Optimum design for new gas lift valve seat. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 149, 456–464. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.062
 Gas-Lift Valve Performance Testing API RP 11V2, 2nd ed, 2008. American Petroleum Institute (API).
 Nieberding, M.A., 1988. Normalization of Nitrogen-loaded Gas-Lift Valve Performance. University of Tulsa
 Sagar, R., 1991. Improved Dynamic Model of Gas-Lift Valve Performance. University of Tulsa.
 Shahri, M., Winkler, H.W., 2011. Practical Method for Measurement of Injection-gas Throughput of Each Gas-Lift Valve before Well Installation, in: SPE Production and Operations Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USAhttps://doi.org/10.2118/141055-MS
Artificial Gas Lift, Gas Lift Valve, Ball Configuration, Seat Size, Gas Throughput.