Machine Learning Regression Approaches for Prediction Microhardness of Al-Y2O3 Composite
Machine Learning Regression Approaches for Prediction Microhardness of Al-Y2O3 Composite
|© 2022 by IJETT Journal|
|Year of Publication : 2022|
|Authors : Sachin Rathore, Ratnesh Kumar Raj Singh, K.L.A. Khan
|DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V70I4P227|
How to Cite?
Sachin Rathore, Ratnesh Kumar Raj Singh, K.L.A. Khan, "Machine Learning Regression Approaches for Prediction Microhardness of Al-Y2O3 Composite," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 303-315, 2022. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V70I4P227
The present study investigated the experimental analysis of microhardness of Al-Y2O3 composite material developed through the friction stir processing (FSP) route. The microhardness values were measured for a different set of experiments, and then these data were used for various machine learning (ML) models. All measured data sets were divided into two portions in which 75% of rules were used for training, and the remaining 25% of the data rules were used for testing the regression models. Experiments were carried out on various input parameters such as tool traverse speed (TS), Spindle speed (SS), number of passes and direction of rotation (tool). The micro-hardness data is considered as output response. The microhardness value increased 34.47% from BM, reaching a maximum of 147 HV on 1000rpm SS and 100 mm/min TS, with double pass FSP in which the direction of rotation of the tool is in the opposite direction. To predict microhardness values, various ML-regression algorithms have been considered, mainly: Fine tree (FT), Linear regression (LR), Interactions Linear regression (ILR), and Robust Linear regression (RLR), Stepwise Linear regression (SLR) and support vector machines (SVM). It is found that RLR generated appropriate prediction of microhardness with minimum errors based on measurement of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Error score (R2), Mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE).
Friction stir processing, Machine learning, Support vector machine, Regression algorithm, Microhardness.
 T. Dursun and C. Soutis, Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys, Materials and Design, 56 (2014) 862–871. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002.
 J. Sarkar and S. Bhattacharyya, Application of graphene and graphene-based materials in clean energy-related devices Minghui, Archives of Thermodynamics, 33(4) (2012) 23–40. doi: 10.1002/er.
 M. Manoharan and J. J. Lewandowski, Effect of reinforcement size and matrix microstructure on the fracture properties of an aluminum metal matrix composite, Materials Science and Engineering A, 150(2) (1992) 179–186. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(92)90110-M.
 Surappa M.K., Aluminium Matrix Composites: Challenges and Opportunities // Sadhana. Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India, 28(1-2) (2003) 319–334.
 T. S. Srivatsan, I. A. Ibrahim, F. A. Mohamed, and E. J. Lavernia, Processing techniques for particulate-reinforced metal aluminium matrix composites, Journal of Materials Science, 26(22) (1991) 5965–5978. doi: 10.1007/BF01113872.
 H. S. Arora, H. Singh, and B. K. Dhindaw, Composite fabrication using friction stir processing - A review, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 61(9–12) (2012) 1043–1055. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3758-8.
 R. S. Mishra, Z. Y. Ma, and I. Charit, Friction stir processing: A novel technique for fabrication of surface composite, Materials Science and Engineering A, 341(1–2) (2003) 307–310. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00199-5.
 S. Wadekar, R. Soladhra, H. Barkade, and N. Thombare, A Review on Friction Stir Technology, International Conference on Ideas, Impact and Innovation in Mechanical Engineering (ICIIIME 2017), 5(6) (2017) 1542–1549.
 lucie beth Johannes, friction stir processing for superplasticity and other applications. (2003) 1–50. 
S. Rathore, R. K. R. Singh, and K. L. A. Khan, Effect of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Composite Foam Developed by Friction Stir Processing, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 235(12) (2021) 1892– 1903. doi: 10.1177/09544054211021341.
 K. Elangovan and V. Balasubramanian, Influences of tool pin profile and tool shoulder diameter on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy, Materials and Design, 29(2) (2008) 362–373. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.030.
 K. Elangovan and V. Balasubramanian, Influences of pin profile and rotational speed of the tool on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy, Materials Science and Engineering A, 459 (2007) 7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.124.
 H. Rana and V. Badheka, Elucidation of the role of rotation speed and stirring direction on AA 7075-B 4 C surface composites formulated by friction stir processing, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 233(5) (2019) 977–994. doi: 10.1177/1464420717736548.
 K. Nakata, Y. G. Kim, H. Fujii, T. Tsumura, and T. Komazaki, Improvement of mechanical properties of aluminum die casting alloy by multi-pass friction stir processing, Materials Science and Engineering, 437 (2006) 274–280. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.150.
 A. Kumar, S. K. Sharma, K. Pal, and S. Mula, Effect of Process Parameters on Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Behavior of Friction Stir Processed Al 7075 Alloy, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 26(3) (2017) 1122–1134. doi: 10.1007/s11665-017-2572-3.
 X. C. Luo, D. T. Zhang, G. H. Cao, C. Qiu, and D. L. Chen, Multi-pass submerged friction stir processing of AZ61 magnesium alloy: strengthening mechanisms and fracture behavior, Journal of Materials Science54(11) (2019) 8640–8654. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-03259-w.
 M. H. Shojaeefard, M. Akbari, A. Khalkhali, and P. Asadi, Effect of tool pin profile on distribution of reinforcement particles during friction stir processing of B4C/aluminum composites, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 232 (2018) 637–651. doi: 10.1177/1464420716642471.
 A. Kumar, S. K. Sharma, K. Pal, and S. Mula, Effect of Process Parameters on Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Behavior of Friction Stir Processed Al 7075 Alloy, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 26(3) (2017) 1122–1134, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11665017-2572-3.
 A. Kordijazi, H. M. Roshan, A. Dhingra, M. Povolo, P. K. Rohatgi, and M. Nosonovsky, Machine-learning methods to predict the wetting properties of iron-based composites, Surface Innovations, 9(2-3) (2021) 111–119. doi: 10.1680/jsuin.20.00024.
 T. Banerjee, S. Dey, A. P. Sekhar, S. Datta, and D. Das, Design of Alumina Reinforced Aluminium Alloy Composites with Improved Tribo-Mechanical Properties: A Machine Learning Approach, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 73(12) (2020) 3059–3069. doi: 10.1007/s12666-020-02108-2.
 J. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Kitipornchai, and J. Yang, Machine learning assisted prediction of mechanical properties of graphene/aluminium nanocomposite based on molecular dynamics simulation, Materials & Design, 213 (2022) 110334. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110334.
 I. A. Shozib et al., Modelling and optimization of microhardness of electroless Ni-P-TiO2composite coating based on machine learning approaches and RSM, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 12 (2021) 1010–1025, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.063.
 S. Rathore, R. K. Raj Singh, and K. L. A. Khan, Artificial intelligent approach for process parameters modeling of friction stir processing, in Materials Today: Proceedings, 43 (2020) 326–334. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.671.
 T. Rajmohan, K. Gokul Prasad, S. Jeyavignesh, K. Kamesh, S. Karthick, and S. Duraimurugan, Studies on friction stir processing parameters on microstructure and micro hardness of Silicon carbide (SiC) particulate reinforced Magnesium (Mg) surface composites, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 390(1) (2018) doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/390/1/012013.
 H. Ahamed and V. Senthilkumar, Role of nano-size reinforcement and milling on the synthesis of nano-crystalline aluminium alloy composites by mechanical alloying, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 505(2) (2010) 772–782.doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.139.
 A. Kumar, K. Pal, and S. Mula, Simultaneous improvement of mechanical strength, ductility and corrosion resistance of stir cast Al7075-2% SiC micro- and nanocomposites by friction stir processing, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 30 (2017) 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.09.005.
 P. Vijayavel and V. Balasubramanian, Effect of tool velocity ratio on tensile properties of friction stir processed aluminum-based metal matrix composites, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 25(3-4) (2016) 99–109. doi: 10.1515/jmbm-2016-0012.
 T. Rajmohan, K. Gokul Prasad, S. Jeyavignesh, K. Kamesh, S. Karthick, and S. Duraimurugan, Studies on friction stir processing parameters on microstructure and micro hardness of Silicon carbide (SiC) particulate reinforced Magnesium (Mg) surface composites, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 390(1) (2018). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/390/1/012013.
 K. Nakata, Y. G. Kim, H. Fujii, T. Tsumura, and T. Komazaki, Improvement of mechanical properties of aluminum die casting alloy by multi-pass friction stir processing, Materials Science and Engineering A, 437(2) (2006) 274–280. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.150.
 W. ben Chaabene, M. Flash, and M. L. Nehdi, Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review, Construction and Building Materials, 260 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119889.
 E. Messele Sefene, A. A. Tsegaw, and A. Mishra, Process parameter optimization of Friction Stir Welding on 6061AA using Supervised Machine Learning Regression-based Algorithms.
 Mohammed. A. Z. & D. S. Tauqir Nasir a, Applications of Machine Learning to Friction Stir Welding Process Optimization, Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 32(2) (2020) 171–186. doi: 10.17576/jkukm-2020-32(2)-01.