New Hybrid Critical Plane Approach for Fatigue Life Estimation and Damage Assessment of Multiaxial Cyclic Loading
New Hybrid Critical Plane Approach for Fatigue Life Estimation and Damage Assessment of Multiaxial Cyclic Loading |
||
 |
 |
|
| © 2024 by IJETT Journal | ||
| Volume-72 Issue-4 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Author : Aliyi Umer Ibrahim, Dereje Engida Woldemichael |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I4P124 | ||
How to Cite?
Aliyi Umer Ibrahim, Dereje Engida Woldemichael, "New Hybrid Critical Plane Approach for Fatigue Life Estimation and Damage Assessment of Multiaxial Cyclic Loading," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 226-237, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V72I4P124
Abstract
To ensure products can withstand multiple cycles of loading over a long period of time, researchers are continually motivated to develop new models. Existing critical plane methods and fatigue life prediction models are often not precise enough for complicated multiaxial loading scenarios. The investigation into the creation of a new hybrid stress-strain critical plane model is very crucial. The hybrid stress-strain critical plane model signifies a paradigm shift in fatigue estimate stress and strain parameter combinations, particularly in components exposed to multiaxial cyclic loading. This model hybridizes the stress and strain parameters to determine the likely plane of crack origination. Thus, the method provides a more precise prediction of fatigue life and damage assessment parameters. The new model has been validated using both numerical and MATLAB simulations, which establishes the credibility and practical applicability of this innovative hybrid stress-strain critical plane model. The proposed critical plane model offers a dependable and original approach for estimating fatigue in components undergoing multiaxial cyclic loading. Its integration of stress and strain parameters provides a holistic perspective, ensuring accurate predictions and advancing the understanding of fatigue mechanisms. This hybrid critical plane model is the original approach for fatigue estimation in components with multiaxial cyclic loading.
Keywords
Fatigue, Multiaxial fatigue model, Hybrid critical plane approach, Damage assessment parameter.
References
[1] W.L. Qu et al., “Multiaxial Low-Cycle Fatigue Life Evaluation under Different Non-Proportional Loading Paths,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1064-1076, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Axel Lundkvist et al., “Geometric and Material Modelling Aspects for Strength Prediction of Riveted Joints,” Metals, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Songyun Ma, Bernd Markert, and Huang Yuan, “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Assessment of Sintered Porous Iron under Proportional and NonProportional Loadings,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 97, pp. 214-226, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Nicholas Gates, and Ali Fatemi, “Multiaxial Variable Amplitude Fatigue Life Analysis Including Notch Effects,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 91, pp. 337-351, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Manuel Carrera et al., “Characterization of the Crack Tip Plastic Zone in Fatigue Via Synchrotron X‐Ray Diffraction,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2086-2098, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Yong Ran, Jianhui Liu, and Linjun Xie, “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction Method Considering Notch Effect and Non-Proportional Hardening,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 136, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Aminreza Karamoozian et al., “An Integrated Approach for Instability Analysis of Lattice Brake System Using Contact Pressure Sensitivity,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 19948-19969, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] A. Ince, and G. Glinka, “A Modification of Morrow and Smith-Watson-Topper Mean Stress Correction Models: A Modification of Morrow and Smith-Watson-Topper Mean Stress Correction Models,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 854-867, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Haoyang Wei, and Yongming Liu, “An Energy-Based Model to Assess Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Assessment under Tension-Torsion and Tension-Tension Loadings,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 141, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Nicholas R. Gates, and Ali Fatemi, “Multiaxial Variable Amplitude Fatigue Life Analysis Using the Critical Plane Approach, Part I: Un-Notched Specimen Experiments and Life Estimations,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 105, pp. 283-295, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Meng-Fei Hao, Shun-Peng Zhu, and Ding Liao, “New Strain Energy-Based Critical Plane Approach for Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction,” The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 310-319, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Tayeb Kebir et al., “Numerical Study of Fatigue Damage Assessment under Random Loading Using Rainflow Cycle Counting,” International Journal of Structural Integrity, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 149-162, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Kimiya Hemmesi, Majid Farajian, and Ali Fatemi, “Application of the Critical Plane Approach to the Torsional Fatigue Assessment of Welds Considering the Effect of Residual Stresses,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 101, pp. 271-281, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Zheng-Yong Yu et al., “A New Energy-Critical Plane Damage Assessment Parameter for Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction of Turbine Blades,” Materials, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-18, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Peng Luo, Weixing Yao, and Luca Susmel, “An Improved Critical Plane and Cycle Counting Method to Assess Damage Assessment under Variable Amplitude Multiaxial Fatigue Loading,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2024-2039, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Zhi-Qiang Tao et al., “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction by Equivalent Energy‐Based Critical Plane Damage Assessment Parameter under Variable Amplitude Loading,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3640-3657, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] A.S. Cruces et al., “Critical Plane Based Method for Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis of 316 Stainless Steel,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, vol. 118, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Long Xue et al., “Equivalent Energy-Based Critical Plane Fatigue Damage Assessment Parameter for Multiaxial LCF under Variable Amplitude Loading,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 131, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Jing Li et al., “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction for Various Metallic Materials Based on the Critical Plane Approach,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 90-101, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Ensheng Feng, Xiaogang Wang, and Chao Jiang, “Multiaxial Fatigue Evaluation of Type 316L Stainless Steel Based on Critical Plane and Energy Dissipation,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3486-3499, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Ladislav Poczklán, Jaroslav Polák, and Tomáš Kruml, “Comparison of Critical Plane Models Based on Multiaxial Low-Cycle Fatigue Tests of 316L Steel,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 171, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] A. Fatemi, and L. Yang, “Cumulative Fatigue Damage Assessment and Life Prediction Theories: A Survey of the State of the Art for Homogeneous Materials,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9-34, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] S.H. Iftikhar, and J. Albinmousa, “A Method for Assessing Critical Plane‐Based Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Assessment Models,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 235-245, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Z. Li et al., “Residual Fatigue Life Prediction Based on a Novel Damage Assessment Accumulation Model Considering Loading History,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1005-1021, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Zhaochun Peng et al., “A New Cumulative Fatigue Damage Assessment Rule Based on Dynamic Residual S-N Curve and Material Memory Concept,” Metals, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1-17, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Jing Li et al., “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction for Metals by Means of an Improved Strain Energy Density Based Critical Plane Criterion,” European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, vol. 90, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Ali Fatemi, and Darrell F. Socie, “A Critical Plane Approach to Multiaxial Fatigue Damage Assessment Including Out-of-Phase Loading,” Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 149-165, 1988.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] K.N. Smith, P. Watson, and T.H. Topper, “A Stress-Strain Function for the Fatigue of Metals,” Journal of Materials, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 767-778, 1970.
[Google Scholar]
[29] E.H. Jordan, M.W. Brown, and K.J. Miller, Fatigue under Severe Nonproportional Loading, Multiaxial Fatigue, pp. 1-17, 1985.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] W.N. Findley, “A Theory for the Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue of Metals under Combined Torsion and Axial Load or Bending,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 301-305, 1959.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Hao Chen et al., “A Nonlinear Fatigue Damage Assessment Accumulation Model under Variable Amplitude Loading Considering the Loading Sequence Effect,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 177, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Lei Gan, Hao Wu, and Zheng Zhong, “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction based on a Simplified Energy-Based Model,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 144, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] William N. Findley, “Combined-Stress Fatigue Strength of 76S-T61 Aluminum Alloy with Superimposed Mean Stresses and Corrections for Yielding,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Note 2924, pp. 1-92, 1953.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] C. Froustey, and S. Lasserre, “Multiaxial Fatigue Endurance of 30NCD16 Steel,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 169- 175, 1989.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Find Rotvel, “Biaxial Fatigue Tests with Zero Mean Stresses Using Tubular Specimens,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 597-602, 1970.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Luca Susmel, and Nicola Petrone, “Multiaxial Fatigue Life Estimations for 6082-T6 Cylindrical Specimens under In-Phase and Out-ofPhase Biaxial Loadings,” European Structural Integrity Society, vol. 31, pp. 83-104, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Andrea Spagnoli, “A New High-Cycle Fatigue Criterion Applied to Out-of-Phase Biaxial Stress State,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2581-2595, 2001.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Andrea Carpinteri, and Andrea Spagnoli, “Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Criterion for Hard Metals,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 135-145, 2001.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] D.L. McDiarmid, “A General Criterion for High Cycle Multiaxial Fatigue Failure,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 429-453, 1991.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]