Performance Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques in Diagnosing Imbalance Using Machine Fault Simulator-A Case Study
Performance Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques in Diagnosing Imbalance Using Machine Fault Simulator-A Case Study |
||
|
||
© 2025 by IJETT Journal | ||
Volume-73 Issue-1 |
||
Year of Publication : 2025 | ||
Author : Vijayalakshmi K, Amuthakkannan Rajakannu, Ramachandran KP, Mohsina Kamarudden, Sri Rajkavin AV |
||
DOI : 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I1P123 |
How to Cite?
Vijayalakshmi K, Amuthakkannan Rajakannu, Ramachandran KP, Mohsina Kamarudden, Sri Rajkavin AV, "Performance Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques in Diagnosing Imbalance Using Machine Fault Simulator-A Case Study," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I1P123
Abstract
The growth of Machine and Deep Learning in the manufacturing sector has been tremendous in the past decade, and it is widely used in many fields. Conditional monitoring of machines is a challenging task in manufacturing and process industries. It requires real-time monitoring to reduce downtime of machines, reduce cost and scraps, and improve the productive ML and DL, which have given promising results in the core domains of feature extraction and fault classification in machine fault detection. This paper addresses applying ML and DL techniques to predict the unbalancing of machines accurately and finding the proper techniques for predicting the unbalancing of rotating machines. This research uses an accelerometer, data acquisition card, and lab view software to collect vibration signals due to unbalancing. The output of the vibration data is collected in terms of frequency domain and time domain data. The ML techniques KNN, Support vector machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and linear discriminant analysis are applied and predict the accurate prediction of unbalancing of machines. Similarly, DL techniques, MLP, CNN, RNN, and LSTM are used to identify the unbalancing of machines. After predicting the accuracy, precision, recall, and FN score of ML and DL, an extensive comparative analysis is done to identify the proper AI techniques in real-time condition monitoring; this research is executed by collecting data from the Spectra quest machine fault simulator. The result shows that ML techniques DT and RF give better results than other ML techniques. Similarly, MLP provides better results than CNN, RNN, and LSTM.
Keywords
Condition monitoring, Machine fault simulator, Machine Learning, Deep Learning.
References
[1] Issam Attoui, and Amar Omeiri, “Fault Diagnosis of an Induction Generator in a Wind Energy Conversion System Using Signal Processing Techniques,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 2262-2275, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Long Wen et al., “A New Convolutional Neural Network-Based Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Method,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 5990-5998, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] M. Claeys et al., “Modal Interactions Due to Friction in the Nonlinear Vibration Response of the “Harmony” Test Structure: Experiments and Simulations,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 376, pp. 131-148, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Jaouher Ben Ali et al., “Online Automatic Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Bearings Progressive Degradations under Real Experimental Conditions Based on Unsupervised Machine Learning,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 132, pp. 167-181, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] S. Tyagi, and S.K. Panigrahi, “Transient Analysis of Ball Bearing Fault Simulation Using Finite Element Method,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, vol. 95, pp. 309-318, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] P.K. Kankar, Satish C. Sharma, and S.P. Harsha, “Fault Diagnosis of Ball Bearings Using Continuous Wavelet Transform,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2300-2312, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Liangwei Zhang et al., “End-to-End Unsupervised Fault Detection Using a Flow-Based Model,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 215, pp. 1-14, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Long Di, and Zongli Lin, “Control of a Flexible Rotor Active Magnetic Bearing Test Rig: A Characteristic Model Based All-Coefficient Adaptive Control Approach,” Control Theory and Technology, vol. 12, pp. 1-12, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Qiang Zhou et al., “A Hybrid Fault Diagnosis Method for Mechanical Components Based on Ontology and Signal Analysis,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 30, pp. 1693-1715, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Mengshi Li et al., “A Data-Driven Residual-Based Method for Fault Diagnosis and Isolation in Wind Turbines,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 895-904, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Weiting Zhang, Dong Yang, and Hongchao Wang, “Data-Driven Methods for Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Equipment: A Survey,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2213-2227, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Rong-Heng Lin et al., “Review on Hydrogen Fuel Cell Condition Monitoring and Prediction Methods,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 5488-5498, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Soukaina Mjahed et al., “Improved PSO Based K-Means Clustering Applied to Fault Signals Diagnosis,” 2018 International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD), Marrakech, Morocco, pp. 1-6, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Junjie Wang et al., “Fault Diagnosis Method of Photovoltaic Array Based on Support Vector Machine,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 5380-5395, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Mariela Cerrada et al., “A Review on Data-Driven Fault Severity Assessment in Rolling Bearings,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 99, pp. 169-196, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Onur Surucu, Stephen Andrew Gadsden, and John Yawney, “Condition Monitoring using Machine Learning: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances,” Expert Systems with Applications, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 221, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Anna Lena Demmerling, and Dirk Soffker, Condition Monitoring: A Review on Real-Time Measurement Techniques for Tool Condition Monitoring and Analysis of Metalworking Fluids, University Library of RWTH Aachen, pp. 191-208, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Josef Koutsoupakis, Dimitrios Giagopoulos, and Iraklis Chatziparasidis, “AI-Based Condition Monitoring on Mechanical Systems Using Multibody Dynamics Models,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 123, no. 3, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Purushottam Gangsar, Aditya Raj Bajpei, and Rajkumar Porwal, “A Review on Deep Learning-Based Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery,” Noise & Vibration Worldwide, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 550-578, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Tyler Ward et al., “A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Condition-Based Maintenance,” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-20, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Hosameldin Ahmed, and Asoke K. Nandi, “Vibration‐Based Condition Monitoring Using Machine Learning,” Condition Monitoring with Vibration Signals: Compressive Sampling and Learning Algorithms for Rotating Machines, pp. 115-130, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Oliver Mey et al., “Machine Learning-Based Unbalance Detection of a Rotating Shaft Using Vibration Data,” 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vienna, Austria, pp. 1610-1617, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Rui Zhao et al., “Deep Learning and Its Applications to Machine Health Monitoring,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 115, pp. 213-237, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Yahya Mohammed Al-Naggar et al., “Condition Monitoring Based on IoT for Predictive Maintenance of CNC Machines,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 102, pp. 314-318, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Onur Avci et al., “A Review of Vibration-Based Damage Detection in Civil Structures: From Traditional Methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 147, pp. 1-45, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Wei Zhang et al., “A Deep Convolutional Neural Network with New Training Methods for Bearing Fault Diagnosis under Noisy Environment and Different Working Load,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 100, pp. 439-453, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Funa Zhou et al., “Deep Learning Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Global Optimization GAN for Unbalanced Data,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 187, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Salim Lahmiri, “A Comparative Study of Statistical Machine Learning Methods for Condition Monitoring of Electric Drive Trains in Supply Chains,” Supply Chain Analytics, vol. 2, pp. 1-7, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Mohammad Zawad Ali et al., “Machine Learning-Based Fault Diagnosis for Single- and Multi-Faults in Induction Motors Using Measured Stator Currents and Vibration Signals,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2378-2391, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Pauline Ong et al., “A Deep Learning Approach for Health Monitoring in Rotating Machineries Using Vibrations and Thermal Features,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 10, pp. 1-9, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Machinery Fault Simulator, SpectraQuest, Inc. [Online]. Available: https://spectraquest.com/machinery-fault-simulator/details/mfs/
[32] Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton, “Deep Learning,” Nature, vol. 521, pp. 436-444, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Chaochun Zhong et al., “Improved MLP Energy Meter Fault Diagnosis Method Based on DBN,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Kurt Hornik, Maxwell Stinchcombe, and Halbert White, “Multilayer Feed Forward Networks are Universal Approximators,” Neural Networks, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 359-366, 1989.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Kaiming He et al., “Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition,” 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp.770-778, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Keiron O’Shea, and Ryan Nash, “An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-11, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, pp. 351-354, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Kaiming He et al., “Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on Image Net Classification,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile, pp. 1026-1034, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] John McGonagle, Christopher Williams, and Jimin Khim, Recurrent Neural Network, Brilliant, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://brilliant.org/wiki/recurrent-neural-network/
[40] Sepp Hochreiter, and Jurgen Schmidhuber, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Divyanshu Thakur, LSTM and its Equations, Medium, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/@divyanshu132/lstm-and-its-equations-5ee9246d04af
[42] Alex Graves, Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 5-13, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Shen Zhang et al., “Deep Learning Algorithms for Bearing Fault Diagnostics-A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 29857-29881, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Yaguo Lei et al., “Applications of Machine Learning to Machine Fault Diagnosis: A Review and Roadmap,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 138, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Cynthia Rudin, “Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 206-215, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Jinjiang Wang et al., “Deep Learning for Smart Manufacturing: Methods and Applications,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 144-156, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Amina Adadi, and Mohammed Berrada, “Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI),” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 52138-52160, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Haidong Shao et al., “Rolling Bearing Fault Feature Learning Using Improved Convolutional Deep Belief Network with Compressed Sensing,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 100, pp. 743-765, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]