Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 74 | Issue 1 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJETT-V74I1P107 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I1P107Performance Evaluation of Self-Compacting Concrete Using Glass Granular Blast Furnace Slag Sand as a Partial Replacement for Manufactured Sand
Nilesh Lende, Smita Patil, Jessly Rajan
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Jul 2025 | 15 Dec 2025 | 25 Dec 2025 | 14 Jan 2026 |
Citation :
Nilesh Lende, Smita Patil, Jessly Rajan, "Performance Evaluation of Self-Compacting Concrete Using Glass Granular Blast Furnace Slag Sand as a Partial Replacement for Manufactured Sand," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 95-107, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V74I1P107
Abstract
This paper explores the effect of Glass-Granular Blast-Furnace-Slag Sand (GGBFS sand) as a partial substitute for Manufactured Sand (M-Sand) in Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC). The purpose of the research was to determine an optimal replacement level, which would maximise performance and simultaneously lead to sustainability because of the use of industrial waste. Blends of GGBFS-sand substitutions were made in seven mixes with 0% to 60% GGBFS-sand substitutions, with a constant composition of OPC and GGBS ratio of 0.30 water-binder mix. The V-funnel, T50, slump-flow, and L-box tests, alongside evaluations of mechanical performance ( flexural strength, compressive, split-tensile, and modulus of elasticity) or durability (water permeability, chloride permeability, and acid resistance tests), were employed to examine the fresh properties. A digital microscopic analysis was done to read surface morphology and pore characteristics. Findings showed that 30% GGBFS-sand replacement showed the best balance in performance by giving an increment of 7% compressive strength and a decrease of 13% chloride charge passed as opposed to the control. The smoother and sub-angular texture and filler effect of slag sand were found to improve its flowability, decrease permeability, and refine surface morphology. At an above percentage of 40, excess fines formed higher viscosity and slightly reduced strength. The results affirm that GGBFS sand (when used under control) creates a stable, compact, durable concrete matrix that is self-compacting and provides efficiency in structure as well as environmental advantage. The material has high potential for sustainable construction, where workability, durability, and the saving of resources are equally important.
Keywords
Self-Compacting Concrete, GGBFS Sand, Manufactured Sand, Workability, Durability, Sustainable Concrete.
References
[1] Saurabh Singh et al.,
“Finding Alternative to River Sand in Building Construction,” Evergreen, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 973-992,
2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Vijaya Bhoopathy, and
Senthil Selvan Subramanian, “The Way Forward to Sustain Environmental Quality
through Sustainable Sand Mining and the use of Manufactured Sand as an
Alternative to Natural Sand,” Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, vol.
29, no. 21, pp. 30793-30801, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Shivang Jayswal, and Mahesh
Mungule, “Assessment of M-Sand as Potential Substitute for Natural Sand in
Concrete” International Conference
on Advances in Construction Materials and Structures (ACMS-2018),
IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand,
India, vol. 2019, pp. 7-8, 2018.
[Google Scholar]
[4] Ranjitha B Tangadagi et
al., “Utilization of Steel Slag as an Eco-Friendly Material in Concrete for
Construction,” Journal of Green Engineering, vol. 10, no. 5, pp.
2408-2419, 2020.
[Google Scholar]
[5] S. Praveen Nayak, “Self -
Compacting Concrete using Slag Sand as Fine Aggregate,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 12, no.
3, pp. 411-414, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[6] Kwabena Boakye, and Morteza
Khorami, “Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) Prepared with Binary and
Ternary Blended Calcined Clay and Steel Slag,” Infrastructures, vol.
9, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Sayed Sabbir Ahamed, and
Ar. Nasreen Parvez, “Slag Sand as a Sustainable Fine Aggregate: Comparative
Performance and Impacts in Concrete Relative to Natural River Sand,” Journal
of Advance and Future Research (JAAFR), vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 202-207,
2025.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Dharmaraj Rajalinggam et
al., “Durability Characteristics on Self-Compacting Concrete using Casting Slag
as Fine Aggregate,” Matter (Rio de
Janeiro), vol. 30, pp. 1-6,
2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] T.V. Reshma et al.,
“Evaluation of Strength, Durability, and Microstructure Characteristics of
Slag-Sand-Induced Concrete,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 10, pp. 1-16, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] M.C. Nataraja et al.,
“Effective Utilization of Slag Sand and Ground Granulated Blastfurnace Slag for
the Production of Green and Sustainable Concrete,” Indian Journal of
Advances in Chemical Science, pp. 201-205, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] B. Narendra Kumar, A.
Meghanadh Reddy, and P. Sai Vineela, “Development of Sustainable high
Performance Self Compacting Concrete using Construction and Demolition Waste
and Steel Slag,” Discover Civil Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-22,
2025.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Zhengyi Ren, and Dongsheng
Li, “Application of Steel Slag as an Aggregate in Concrete Production: A
Review,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 1-23, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Suiwei Pan et al.,
“Experimental Study on the Workability and Stability of Steel Slag
Self-Compacting Concrete,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-15,
2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] IS 12269:1987 -
Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi, 1987. [Online]. Available: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.12269.1987.pdf
[15] IS 16714:2018 - Ground
Granulated Blast Furnace Slag for use in Cement, Mortar and Concrete -
Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2018. [Online].
Available:
https://standardsbis.bsbedge.com/BIS_SearchStandard.aspx?Standard_Number=IS%2016714&id=23059
[16] Chiranjeevi Tadi, and T.
Chandrasekhar Rao, “Investigating the Performance of Self-Compacting Concrete
Pavement Containing GGBS,” Materialstoday: Proceedings, vol. 49, pp.
2013-2018, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] IS 383: 1970 - Specification
for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.383.1970.pdf
[18] IS 456: 2000 - Plain and
Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi,
2000. [Online]. Available:
https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.456.2000.pdf
[19] IS 2386-4:1963 - Methods of
Test for Aggregates for Concrete, Part 4: Mechanical Properties, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2002. [Online]. Available:
https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2386.4.1963.pdf
[20] M. Harini, G. Shaalini, and
G. Dhinakaran, “Effect of Size and Type of Fine Aggregates on Flowability of
Mortar,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 163-168,
2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] IS 10262: 2019 - Guidelines
for Concrete Mix Design Proportioning,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2019. [Online]. Available:
https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.10262.2009.pdf
[22] EFNARC, Specification and
Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete, European Federation of National
Associations Representing for Concrete, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://efnarc.org/publications
[23] IS 516: Part 1: Sec 1:
2021: Hardened Concrete Methods of Test part 1 Testing of Strength of Hardened
Concrete Section 1 Compressive, Flexucal and Split Tensile Strength (First
Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://standardsbis.bsbedge.com/BIS_SearchStandard.aspx?Standard_Number=IS%20516%20:%20Part%201%20:%20Sec%201&id=34006
[24] “ASTM C1202-19: Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of
Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[25] IS 1199: Part 6: 2018:
Fresh Concrete - Methods of Sampling, Testing and Analysis Part 6 Tests on
Fresh Self Compacting Concrete (First Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards,
New Delhi, 2018. [Online]. Available:
https://standardsbis.bsbedge.com/BIS_SearchStandard.aspx?Standard_Number=IS%201199%20:%20Part%206&id=23797
[26] Hajime Okamura, and Masahiro Ouchi,
“Self-Compacting Concrete,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology,
vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-15, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]