Citation :

Miguel R. Manco Rivera, Miguel Celis Carbajal, Gustavo O. Guarniz Avalos, "Modelling Approaches for Thermal Response of RCB Under Fire Exposure," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 1-9, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I12P101

Abstract

Reinforced Concrete Beams - RCB are widely used in buildings, bridges, and other types of infrastructure due to their versatility and high load capacity. Besides the typical service conditions, such structural systems can experience unexpected events, such as partial or total fires. Experimental tests are so expensive, and there is little data regarding these accidents. The current regulation offers some analysis options for this type of phenomenon. A localized fire generates a highly nonlinear temperature gradient that, in some cases, is capable of generating stresses in RCB structures of the same order of magnitude as their dead and live loads. These stresses are due to restrictions on thermal expansion (or contraction) and can give rise to cracking that reduces or even eliminates these stresses. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques provide a highly detailed description of fire-induced thermal phenomena, but their practical implementation remains limited due to computational constraints. This research proposes an integrated strategy that couples CFD-based fire analysis with Finite Element (FE) heat transfer modelling to estimate the thermal response of RCB under localized fire conditions. Additionally, this thermal field is compared with that obtained with the LF-ESF model. The analysis is performed with a unidirectional coupled model in which data derived from the CFD simulation are subsequently incorporated into the Finite Element model to determine the thermal behaviour of the system. The LF-ESF model employs updates to classical models for the temperature field distribution and heat transfer coefficients. It also employs an ellipsoidal solid flame model to describe radiative heat transfer. The results obtained are satisfactory, showing that the LF-ESF model presents conservative results, while the CFD-FEM models obtain more precise temperatures in the RCB but at a considerably higher computational cost.

Keywords

Localized Fire, CFD-FEM, Reinforced Concrete.

References

[1] EN 1992-1-2: Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-2: General Rules - Structural Fire Design, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1992.1.2.2004.pdf

[2] EN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures - Part 1-2: General Rules - Structural Fire Design, European Union, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1993.1.2.2005.pdf

[3] EN 1991-1-2: Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures - Part 1-2: General Actions - Actions on Structures Exposed to Fire, European Union, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1991.1.2.2002.pdf

[4] Morgan J. Hurley et al., SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5^th ed., Springer Nature, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link] 

[5] Jose Alos-Moya et al., “Valencia Bridge Fire Tests: Experimental Study of a Composite Bridge under Fire,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 138, pp. 538-554, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Thomaz Eduardo Teixeira Buttignol, “Analytical and Numerical Analyses of RC Beams Exposed to Fire Adopting a LITS Trilinear Constitutive Law for Concrete,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 17, pp. 1-20, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Yamin Song et al., “Fire Resistance Investigation of Simple Supported RC Beams with Varying Reinforcement Configurations,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Aneesha Balaji et al., “Studies on the Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Short Column Subjected to Fire,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 475-486, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Jinggang Zhou et al., “Comparison of Different CFD-FEM Coupling Methods in Advanced Structural Fire Analysis,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 193, pp. 1-38, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] J.A. Feenstra et al., “Automated Two-Way Coupling of CFD Fire Simulations to Thermomechanical FE Analyses at the Overall Structural Level,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 96, pp. 165-175, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Julio Cesar G. Silva, Alexandre Landesmann, and Fernando Luiz B. Ribeiro, “Fire-Thermomechanical Interface Model for Performance-Based Analysis of Structures Exposed to Fire,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 83, pp. 66-78, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Chao Zhang et al., “Simulation Methodology for Coupled Fire-Structure Analysis: Modeling Localized Fire Tests on a Steel Column,” Fire Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 239-262, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Chao Zhang, Guo-Qiang Li, and Asif Usmani, “Simulating the Behavior of Restrained Steel Beams to Flame Impingement from Localized-Fires,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 83, pp. 156-165, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Min Gyu Ryu et al., “Finite Element Modeling for the Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Stiffened-Plate Structures in Fires,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 159, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Qing Xu, Guo-Qiang Li, and Yong C. Wang, “A Simplified Method for Calculating Non-Uniform Temperature Distributions in Thin-Walled Steel Members Protected by Intumescent Coatings under Localized Fires,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 162, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] I. Payá-Zaforteza, and M.E.M. Garlock, “A Numerical Investigation on the Fire Response of a Steel Girder Bridge,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 75, pp. 93-103, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Rachel Wasson et al., “Influence of a Ceiling on Fire Plume Velocity and Temperature,” Fire Technology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1863-1886, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] U. Wickström, “The Adiabatic Surface Temperature and the Plate Thermometer,” Fire Safety Science, pp. 1001-1011, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Ulf Wickström, Johan Anderson, and Johan Sjöström, “Measuring Incident Heat Flux and Adiabatic Surface Temperature with Plate Thermometers in Ambient and High Temperatures,” Fire and Materials, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 51-56, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] J. Sjostrom et al., Thermal Exposure to a Steel Column from Localized Fires, Science Partner Technical Research Institute of Swedan, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] Ulf Wickström et al., “Technical Comment-Ten Fundamental Principles on Defining and Expressing Thermal Exposure as Boundary Conditions in Fire Safety Engineering,” Fire and Materials, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 985-988, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] Simulia D.S., “Abaqus 6.12 documentation. Providence, Rhode Island, US 2012:6.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Kevin B. McGrattan et al., Fire Dynamics Simulator-Technical Reference Guide, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/IR/nistir6467.pdf

[24] Kevin McGrattan et al., Fire Dynamics Simulator, User’s Guide, National Institute of Standards and Technology Engineering Laboratory, 6^th ed., 2015.
[Google Scholar]

[25] James G. Quintiere, Fundamentals of Fire Phenomena, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[26] Chao Zhang, Zhe Zhang, and Guo-Qiang Li, “Simple vs. Sophisticated Fire Models to Predict Performance of SHS Column in Localized Fire,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 120, pp. 62-69, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]