International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 73 | Issue 12 | Year 2025 | Article Id. IJETT-V73I12P107 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I12P107

Comparative Analysis of Monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline PV Performance in Grid-Tied Systems: Efficiency, Losses, and MPPT Optimisation Using Incremental Conductance with Integral Regulator


Bright Olileaya Boniface, Mehmet Kuşaf

Received Revised Accepted Published
19 Sep 2025 20 Nov 2025 01 Dec 2025 19 Dec 2025

Citation :

Bright Olileaya Boniface, Mehmet Kuşaf, "Comparative Analysis of Monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline PV Performance in Grid-Tied Systems: Efficiency, Losses, and MPPT Optimisation Using Incremental Conductance with Integral Regulator," International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 72-83, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V73I12P107

Abstract

This research compares the performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline Photovoltaic (PV) module systems in grid-connected systems using the improved Incremental Conductance with Integral Regulator (IC-IR) Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) algorithm. While many MPPT algorithms have been developed to optimise PV system performance, limited research has not compared their effectiveness across different PV system types when operating in grid-tied PV systems. To fill this knowledge gap, a 120 kW PV system was modelled and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink across a range of irradiance levels from 200 W/m² to 1000 W/m². The IC-IR algorithm used is an improvement to the conventional incremental conductance MPPT method; it includes an integral regulator to improve dynamic response and remove steady-state oscillations. The results indicate that monocrystalline PV modules achieved a slight increase in peak power output (118.32 kW) compared to polycrystalline PV modules (118.30 kW), operated at 214 V and 192 V, respectively. Additionally, the results showed that polycrystalline panels had a higher average efficiency (97.0–98.9%) than monocrystalline panels (96.7–99.1%) across the varying irradiance levels tested. Finally, the IC-IR method reduced MPPT voltage oscillations by 37% and achieved a steady-state error of less than 2%. The results of this study demonstrate the ability of the IC-IR method to accurately and reliably track MPPT for both monocrystalline and polycrystalline PV modules within a grid-connected PV system and can be applied to optimise the PV module type selected and the design of inverters used in renewable energy applications.

Keywords

Photovoltaic System, MPPT, Incremental Conductance, Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline.

References

[1] Ciprian Cristea, Maria Cristea, and Radu-Adrian Tîrnovan, “Techno-Economic Assessment of Grid-Connected Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems using Various Photovoltaic Technologies: A Case Study in the Northwestern Romania,” 2021 International Conference on Electromechanical and Energy Systems (SIELMEN), Iasi, Romania, pp. 408-412, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Neha Kumari et al., “Performance Investigation of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline PV Modules under Real Conditions,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 169869-169878, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Karri V.V. Satyanarayana, and H.Z. Amrolia, “Energy Management of Grid Connected PV System without Energy Storage using High Gain Converter for DC Microgrid Applications,” 2025 IEEE 1st International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Developments in Electrical Engineering (SSDEE), Dhanbad, India, pp. 1-6, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] William Phipps, and Divya Sivadas, “Economic Evaluation of a Grid-Connected PV System at Otago Polytechnic,” 2017 Second International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), Coimbatore, India, pp. 1-6, 2017.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Al Imran Fahim, and Salah Uddin Yusuf, “Energy Management System of a PV-Based Grid-Connected Electric Vehicle in Bangladesh,” 2023 10th IEEE International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, pp. 1-6, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Maha M. Hassan et al., “An improved Perturb and Observe based MPPT Method and Power Stabilization for Grid Connected PV System,” 2021 22nd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), Assiut, Egypt, pp. 483-490, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Ong-art Sadmai, Boonyang Plangklang, and Somchai Hiranvarodom, “Performance Analysis of a 3kWp Grid Connected PV System in the University of Pathumthani Province,” 2021 9th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Pattaya, Thailand, pp. 73-76, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Rituraj Rituraj, and Péter Kádár, “Performance Analysis of 50 KWp Rooftop Grid-Connected PV System,” 2021 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY), Subotica, Serbia, pp. 177-182, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Nablous El Hajjam et al., “Comparative Study of Production of Three Grid-Connected PV Systems in Two Cities of Morocco,” 2021 9th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), Morocco, pp. 1-4, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] Saibal Manna, and Ashok Kumar Akella, “Comparative Analysis of Various P&O MPPT Algorithm for PV System Under Varying Radiation Condition,” 2021 1st International Conference on Power Electronics and Energy (ICPEE), Bhubaneswar, India, pp. 1-6, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] P.K. Vineeth Kumar, and K. Manjunath, “A Comparitive Analysis of MPPT Algorithms for Solar Photovoltaic Systems to Improve the Tracking Accuracy,” 2018 International Conference on Control, Power, Communication and Computing Technologies (ICCPCCT), Kannur, India, pp. 540-547, 2018.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Mohamed Ahliouati, Rabie El Otmani, and Khalid Kandoussi, “Performance Analysis of Monocrystalline PV Module Under the Effect of Moroccan Arid Climatic Conditions,” 2023 3rd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), Mohammedia, Morocco, pp. 1-6, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[13] Syed Ayan et al., “Soiling-Induced Efficiency Losses in Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study of Monocrystalline Monofacial and Bifacial Panels,” 2025 International Conference on Power Electronics Converters for Transportation and Energy Applications (PECTEA), Jatni, India, pp. 1-6, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Aryulius Jasuan, Zainuddin Nawawi, and Hazairin Samaulah, “Comparative Analysis of Applications Off-Grid PV System and On-Grid PV System for Households in Indonesia,” 2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (ICECOS), Pangkal, Indonesia, pp. 253-258, 2018.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Thanh-Dong Ngo, Cao-Tri Nguyen, and Sy Ngo, “Enhanced MPPT-Based Control Strategy for Single-Phase Grid-Connected Inverters in PV Systems,” 2025 10th International Conference on Applying New Technology in Green Buildings (ATiGB), Danang, Vietnam, pp. 483-488, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Rukhsana Choudhury, and Galib Hashmi, “Development of a Dual-Operation Grid-Connected Rooftop PV System with Capacity and Space Optimization Under NEM Guidelines in Bangladesh,” 2024 IEEE International Women in Engineering (WIE) Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (WIECON-ECE), Chennai, India, pp. 222-227, 2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Raed Alcharea, and Waseem Saeed, “Evaluating Grid Connected Photovoltaic System Performance and Estimating the Produced Electric Power,” 2021 12th International Renewable Engineering Conference (IREC), Amman, Jordan, pp. 1-4, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Ankur Paras, Upendra Prasad, and Amit Kumar Choudhary, “Comparative Assessment of ANN-based MPPT Algorithm for Solar PV System,” 2022 IEEE North Karnataka Subsection Flagship International Conference (NKCon), pp. 1-6, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Ahmed Saidi, and Chellali Benachaiba, “Comparison of IC and P&O Algorithms in MPPT for Grid Connected PV Module,” 2016 8th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC), Algiers, Algeria, pp. 213-218, 2016.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Azmi Saleh et al., “Comparison of MPPT Fuzzy Logic Controller based on Perturb and Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (InC) Algorithm on Buck-Boost Converter,” 2018 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI), Batam, Indonesia, pp. 154-158, 2018.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] Göksel Gökkuş, and Mustafa Sacid Endiz, “Simplified P&O MPPT Algorithm for Accurate Power Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems,” 2025 International Conference on Computer Technology Applications (ICCTA), Vienna, Austria, pp. 217-221, 2025.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] K.H. Akhil et al., “Comparison of Performance of MPPT Algorithms for Solar Powered Battery Charging Applications,” 2024 3rd International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT), GOA, India, pp. 1-5, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Mohammad R. Al-Soeidat, Alexis Cembrano, and Dylan D.C. Lu, “Comparing Effectiveness of Hybrid MPPT Algorithms Under Partial Shading Conditions,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON), Wollongong, NSW, Australia, pp. 1-6, 2016.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[24] Christopher C. Bondoc et al., “Holistic Assessment of Monocrystalline Silicon (mono-Si) Solar Panels with Recycled Content vs. Virgin-Grade Materials,” 2023 IEEE 50th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), San Juan, PR, USA, pp. 1-3, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[25] Nur Adibah Jumien et al., “Performance of a 2.8 Kwp Monocrystalline Free-Standing Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System at SIRIM Berhad,” 2015 IEEE 6th Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC), Shah Alam, Malaysia, pp. 93-97, 2015.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[26] Jian Zhang et al., “Coordinated Control Strategy of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Generation System,” 2023 8th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering (ACPEE), Tianjin, China, pp. 579-584, 2023.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[27] Suresh Singh, Rakesh Kumar, and Vivek Vijay, “Performance Analysis of 58 kW Grid-Connected Roof-Top Solar PV System,” 2014 6th IEEE Power India International Conference (PIICON), Delhi, India, pp. 1-6, 2014.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[28] Nasser Aldahmashi, Yasin Khan, and Abdulrahman Alamoud, “Techno-Economic Analysis of Grid-Connected Rooftop Solar PV Systems in Saudi Arabia,” 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, pp. 2217-2221, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[29] Zhipeng Fan et al., “Perturb and Observe MPPT Algorithm of Photovoltaic System: A Review,” 2021 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Kunming, China, pp. 1413-1418, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[30] Paramjeet Singh Paliyal et al., “Optimization of Solar Photovoltaic Array In-Depth Analysis of Perturb and Observe MPPT Algorithm,” 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Materials (ICACCM), Dehradun, India, pp. 1-6, 2024.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]